Role Stress and Effectiveness in Horizontal Alliances

Abstract

Horizontal arrangements are increasingly deployed in organizational networks, yet research has rarely examined the effectiveness of these alliances. The coalition of disparate corporate cultures yields appreciable levels of role stress for people in boundary-spanning positions. Dedicated assets and communication modality are factors that influence the level of role ambiguity and conflict. The authors implicate these facets of role stress as antecedents to four forms of effectiveness drawn from the competing values framework. The authors present alternative perspectives that examine the relationship between stress and performance. The received view frames role stressors as linear, negative antecedents to organizational outcomes. The authors contrast this perspective with theories that espouse triphasic, parabolic, and interactive influences of stressors on organizational outcomes. Data gathered with 218 managers of dual-branded retail oil outlets indicate that the relevance of these alternative perspectives is mitigated by the form of effectiveness pursued by the organization. The results support a linear relationship between role conflict and bargaining efforts, yet they also offer evidence of nonlinear influences of role ambiguity on contributions to sales, customer satisfaction, and competence. The study concludes with a discussion of relevance of the findings to the management of horizontal alliances and to interorganizational theory.

Benefits and Drawbacks of Coopetition: The Roles of Scope and Durability in Coopetitive Relationships

“…The analysis of the benefits of coopetition draws its inspiration not only from theoretical foundations (transaction cost theory, game theory, and the resource-based approach), but also from cooperation experiences and strategic alliances (especially horizontal ones) [48,[68][69][70][71][72][73].…”

Radical innovation in strategic partnerships: A framework for analysis

“…A central authority can become a source of charismatic leadership and provide better motivation of the partners (Nord & Tucker 1987), streamline the process of outlining research priorities and reduce role ambiguity (Nygaard & Dahlstrom 2002). Having clearly defined research goals and explicit guidelines, partners feel more confident about the future and may exhibit more willingness to commit to the alliance.…”

Transformational leadership in the South African public service after the April 2009 national elections

“…Further, stress that leadership transformation and redeployment of employees can cause social identity issues that can lead to frustration and anger about uneven performance and reduced job satisfaction. (p. 49) Ernst and Vitt, 2000;Hogg and Terry, 2000;and Nygaard and Dahlstrom, 2002 maintain that these leadership issues can cause an exodus of talent, tardiness, absenteeism, lower productivity, reduced customer satisfaction, less innovation and, ultimately, reduced economic benefits. Therefore, it is vital that managers become transformational leaders because leader effectiveness determines the success levels of organisations.…”