2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical innovation in strategic partnerships: A framework for analysis

Abstract: The study proposes a conceptual model of the phenomenon of a radical innovation partnership and examines particular partner attributes affecting its performance. Borrowing from the paradox perspective in organizational studies, the model argues that a radical innovation partnership features several paradoxes -the paradox of a partnership structure, the paradox of partnership resources, and the paradox of partnership processes and that particular partner attributes affect the competing demands within each parad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest that relational capital facilitates both radical innovation and incremental innovation through information sharing and risk and benefit sharing. In addition, this study also confirms that information sharing and joint decision making are determinants of radical innovation ( Jimenez-Jimenez et al, 2018;Sadovnikova et al, 2016), whereas benefit and risk sharing is a determinant of incremental innovation (Lee et al, 2011).…”
Section: Academic Contributionssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results suggest that relational capital facilitates both radical innovation and incremental innovation through information sharing and risk and benefit sharing. In addition, this study also confirms that information sharing and joint decision making are determinants of radical innovation ( Jimenez-Jimenez et al, 2018;Sadovnikova et al, 2016), whereas benefit and risk sharing is a determinant of incremental innovation (Lee et al, 2011).…”
Section: Academic Contributionssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, Dewar and Dutton (1986) indicate that centralisation in decision making is negatively associated with the adoption of incremental innovation. In other words, joint decision making becomes more relevant for radical (Sadovnikova et al, 2016) than for incremental innovation. In fact, incremental innovation does not require complex conditions.…”
Section: Collaboration and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the creation of new knowledge to facilitate the creation of substantially new products (Benner & Tushman, 2003). Knowledge will allow to create different features that can be observed in existing products and markets (Sadovnikova, Pujari, & Mikhailitchenko, 2016;Sheng & Chien, 2016). It is not surprising that the literature indicates that a balance between the two types of innovation to achieve competitive advantages in the short and long term is required (Forés & Camisón, 2016).…”
Section: The Importance Of Radical Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because RPI can substantially improve an organization's performance, create greater customer value and effectively reduce operating costs (Woodside and Biemans, 2005), it is recognized as a source of long-term competitive advantage (Sadovnikova et al, 2016). However, few studies have investigated how suppliers can improve RPI in terms of suppliercustomer relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%