Role of ride-hailing in multimodal commuting

Sunitiyoso, Yos; Rahayu, Wulan Asti; Nuraeni, Shimaditya; Nurdayat, Ilham Fadhil; Pambudi, Noorhan Firdaus; Hadiansyah, Fikri

doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2022.04.013

Cited by 12 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies focusing on RHSs in Indonesia reveal their dual function in urban transportation: they both supplement and compete with transit systems. Specifically, in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area (JMA)-Indonesia's capital-evidence suggests that RHSs, especially motorcycle RHSs, augment Bus Rapid Transit and metro systems by serving as FLM modes while simultaneously challenging existing micro-transit services [34][35][36]. Conversely, investigations in other Indonesian urban centres, such as Yogyakarta, Semarang, and Bandung, have delved into how RHSs can act as a substitute for city bus services [37,38].…”

Section: Literature Review 21 Bridging the Gap Between Rhss And Transitmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The literature also explores the key important reasons for utilizing RHSs. In general, cheaper and transparent fees [47][48][49][50][51], being cashless [35,52], having predictable and short travel times including waiting times [51,53], comfort [14,47], security [54][55][56], and safety [57,58] are key determinates for RHS use. For example, a study revealed that RHSs employ pricing tactics like surge pricing and incentive bonuses to manage the equilibrium between supply and demand, thus guaranteeing transparent fee structures [48,49].…”

Section: Motivations Behind Utilizing Rhssmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Meanwhile, another study found that RHS offers more economical transportation while maintaining service quality, rendering it a financially prudent option for travel [59,60]. Additionally, a study investigated reasons for travellers in JMA to use RHSs as their FLM mode connecting commuter lines, bus rapid transit, and mass rail transit, including the convenience of switching to an RHS, the clarity of the pickup location, and the integration of payment methods [35]. Meanwhile, a study concluded that people who own bank accounts and smartphones are more likely to use RHSs for their FLM mode among Los Angeles metro passengers [20].…”

Section: Motivations Behind Utilizing Rhssmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 1 presents a summary of prior studies outlining the motivations behind the utilization of RHSs. Positive correlation Easy handling of hefty luggage [61] Positive correlation Convenience [14,47] Positive correlation Secure and safety [54][55][56][57][58]62] Positive correlation Cashless [35,52] Positive correlation Simple ordering process [35] Positive correlation Door-to-door service [62] Positive correlation Clarity of pickup location [35] Positive correlation Cheaper and transparent fee [47][48][49][50][51] Positive correlation Short waiting time [51,53] Positive correlation Reliable travel time [53,61] Positive correlation H5. RHS use for FM affects LM Self-developed Positive correlation * Yogyakarta city and ** airport as a reference category.…”

Section: Motivations Behind Utilizing Rhssmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs

Widiastuti,

Irawan

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to fill a research gap by focusing on ride-hailing services (RHSs) as first- and last-mile (FLM) modes linking intercity hubs, which have been explored less than metro hubs. Involving 418 RHS users in the Yogyakarta conurbation, Indonesia, this study applies confirmatory factor analysis to identify the motivations for using RHSs as FLM modes and employs a seemingly unrelated regression model to analyse factors influencing RHS usage and the relationship between first-mile and last-mile use, which remains underexplored. The model’s results reveal that the utilization of RHSs for the first mile is mostly seen among younger, educated, and wealthy persons. However, these variables did not impact last-mile-mode use. The model’s results also show that in FLM contexts, vehicle ownership did not substantially impact RHS use. In addition, RHSs are less often used for trips to intercity bus terminals compared to airports and railway stations. This study also highlights the significance of user preferences, such as comfort and safety, seamless transaction and service, and cost and time efficiency, in influencing the use of RHSs for FLM modes. Increasing RHS accessibility at transit hubs, expanding e-payment options, simplifying payments, and prioritizing fairness are suggested strategies to improve urban sustainability through RHSs.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review 21 Bridging the Gap Between Rhss And Transitmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivations Behind Utilizing Rhssmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivations Behind Utilizing Rhssmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivations Behind Utilizing Rhssmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs

Widiastuti,

Irawan

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A few studies in this literature try to assess this potential complementarity and competition by looking at the overlap between the origins and destinations of trips conducted by ride-hailing versus transit (Jin et al, 2019;Kong et al, 2020;Liao, 2021). Other studies using travel surveys have shown that TNCs are increasingly used as first-last mile alternatives to integrate with transit (Bedoya-Maya et al, 2022;Brown et al, 2021;Sunitiyoso et al, 2022). Along these lines, there is also growing research on ride-hailing and transportation equity, looking at whether TNCs can effectively improve the mobility conditions of low-income and disadvantaged communities (Brown et al, 2022;Jiao & Wang, 2020;Jin et al, 2019) or whether ride-hailing services end up exacerbating the gap in the urban mobility and accessibility conditions of different socioeconomic groups (Abdelwahab et al, 2021;Barajas & Brown, 2021;Brown et al, 2021).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ride-hailing and transit accessibility considering the trade-off between time and money

Pereira¹,

Herszenhut²,

Saraiva³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ride-hailing services have the potential to expand access to opportunities, but out-of-pocket costs may limit the benefits of ride-hail for low-income individuals. This paper examines how ride-hailing services can shape spatial and socioeconomic differences in access to opportunities while accounting for the trade-off between travel time and monetary costs. Using one year of aggregate Uber trip data for Rio de Janeiro in 2019 and a new multi-objective optimization routing method, we analyze the potential for ride-hailing services to improve employment accessibility when used as a standalone transportation mode and in conjunction with transit as a first-mile feeder service. We compare the accessibility Pareto frontiers of these transport mode alternatives with cumulative opportunity measures considering multiple combinations of travel time and monetary cost thresholds. We find that, compared to transit, ride-hailing can significantly expand accessibility as a standalone transport mode for relatively short trips (between 10 and 40 minutes), and as a first-mile feeder to transit in trips longer than 30 minutes. In both cases, the accessibility advantages of ride-hailing are mostly limited by relatively higher out-of-pocket costs. When we account for different affordability thresholds, the accessibility benefits of ride-hailing services accrue mostly to high-income groups. These findings suggest that policy efforts to integrate rideshare with transit are likely not going to benefit low-income communities without some form of subsidized fare discounts to alleviate affordability barriers. The paper also highlights how accounting for trade-offs between travel-time and monetary costs can importantly influence the results of transportation accessibility and equity studies, suggesting that this issue should be addressed in future research.

show abstract

Ride-hailing and transit accessibility considering the trade-off between time and money

Pereira,

Herszenhut,

Saraiva

et al. 2024

Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Role of ride-hailing in multimodal commuting

Cited by 12 publications

References 47 publications

Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs

Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs

Ride-hailing and transit accessibility considering the trade-off between time and money

Ride-hailing and transit accessibility considering the trade-off between time and money

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About