1977
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330470303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rocker jaws

Abstract: Most adult Polynesian mandibles are of the rocker form. Polynesian crania possess a very open cranial base angle and a large upper facial height. The mandibular growth rotations necessary to maintain occlusion in the presence of this cranial morphology lead to development of an exceptionally closed ramus-body angle, with consequent loss of the antegonial notch and appearance of the rocker form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that an increased vertical jaw depth is required in the human mandible when it is called upon to produce high, molar biting forces. The Polynesian "rocker jaw," for example, is characterized by a continuously curved lower border without an antegonial notch (i.e., an increased vertical depth), and has a vertically oriented, high ramus (Houghton, 1977(Houghton, , 1978. This unique shape is thought to be an adaptive response to the combined influences of the open cranial base angle and large vertical facial development found in Polynesians (Kean and Houghton, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that an increased vertical jaw depth is required in the human mandible when it is called upon to produce high, molar biting forces. The Polynesian "rocker jaw," for example, is characterized by a continuously curved lower border without an antegonial notch (i.e., an increased vertical depth), and has a vertically oriented, high ramus (Houghton, 1977(Houghton, , 1978. This unique shape is thought to be an adaptive response to the combined influences of the open cranial base angle and large vertical facial development found in Polynesians (Kean and Houghton, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mandible does not overtly display a 'rocker jaw' morphology-the lower border has an indication of convexity from front to back, but the gonial angle (120.5°) is larger than that associated with the 'rocker' morphology displayed in pre-historical New Zealand remains measured by Houghton (1977): mean gonial angle of female rocker jaws (n=63): 97.85°, SD 4.05; mean gonial angle of females lacking rocker jaws (n=18): 102.20°, SD 4.05). That the gonial angle is also considerably larger than Houghton's non-rocker jaw values is curious, but it should be noted that Houghton's sample of pre-historical female remains lacking rocker jaws is fairly small (n=18).…”
Section: Jawmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two studies have been undertaken on the remains, including the field observations of Roger Duff during excavation (1950Duff during excavation ( , 1956 and detailed laboratory analysis by Philip Houghton (1975Houghton ( , 1977. In April 2009, the Wairau Bar tupuna (ancestors) were repatriated to the iwi Rangitane, the custodians of the site, and ceremonially reburied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocker shape jaws are seen in some populations at puberty due to increased muscular force with growth [7]. The mandible loses the antigonial notch and the angle becomes more convex in appearance [8]. Overall, these studies all point to the conclusion that there is an influence of masticatory muscle function on craniofacial growth.…”
Section: Muscle Function Alters Craniofacial Formmentioning
confidence: 99%