2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00780-012-0199-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust utility maximization for a diffusion market model with misspecified coefficients

Abstract: The paper studies the robust maximization of utility from terminal wealth in a diffusion financial market model. The underlying model consists of a tradable risky asset whose price is described by a diffusion process with misspecified trend and volatility coefficients, and a non-tradable asset with a known parameter. The robust functional is defined in terms of a utility function. An explicit characterization of the solution is given via the solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman-Isaacs (HJBI) equation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, the non-dominated problem has also been studied in various contexts. For instance, [35] investigated a compact set of possible drift and volatility coefficients and tackled the robust problem by solving an associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. In [24], where volatility coefficients are uncertain over a compact set and the drift is known, the theory of BSDEs is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the non-dominated problem has also been studied in various contexts. For instance, [35] investigated a compact set of possible drift and volatility coefficients and tackled the robust problem by solving an associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. In [24], where volatility coefficients are uncertain over a compact set and the drift is known, the theory of BSDEs is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, we are aware of only few recent articles on the related problem of expected utility maximization under uncertainty about both drifts and volatilities (cf. Tevzadze et al 2013;Biagini and Pınar 2017;Neufeld and Nutz 2016) some of which achieve quite explicit results for models with specific parametric structure. Among many interesting contributions on utility optimization under only one type of uncertainty, see for instance Chen and Epstein (2002), Quenez (2004), Garlappi et al (2007), Schied (2007) or Øksendal and Sulem (2014) for (dominated) uncertainty solely about drifts, or Matoussi et al (2015) and Hu et al (2014b) for ambiguity solely about volatilities but not about drifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that T is a large enough number. For the logarithm utility case, the optimal consumption c * t = x * c,L (q L (t)), t ∈ [ 0, T ], is a deterministic process, with x * c,L (·) and q L (·) given respectively in (29) and (34). Moreover, the optimal consumption c * t is summarized in Table 5 3 .…”
Section: The Optimal Consumption Under Logarithm Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is clear that the solution of ODE (19) takes the form (34). From (29), we know that x * c,L (x q ) is nonincreasing with respect to x q . Moreover, the expression (34) implies that q L (·) is nondecreasing with respect to t when ρ ≥ λ, and nonincreasing with respect to t when ρ ≤ λ.…”
Section: The Optimal Consumption Under Logarithm Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%