2021
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2019.2957052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Iterative Learning Control of 2-D Linear Discrete FMMII Systems Subject to Iteration-Dependent Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, to destroy a target with bombs, the proposed method can reduce the number of bombs at the cost of computing time. Future research will extend the EA-HOILC developed in this paper to the dynamical systems with uncertainties in real application [35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, to destroy a target with bombs, the proposed method can reduce the number of bombs at the cost of computing time. Future research will extend the EA-HOILC developed in this paper to the dynamical systems with uncertainties in real application [35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying Lemma 1 to (21) with convergence condition (10) and considering (17) and (20), we can derive…”
Section: Hoilc Design and Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, Ē0false(jfalse)$$ \left\Vert {\bar{E}}_0(j)\right\Vert $$ is bounded for j=0,1,,T2$$ j=0,1,\dots, {T}_2 $$ due to the boundedness property of yn,0dfalse(i,jfalse)$$ {y}_{n,0}^d\left(i,j\right) $$ and yn,0false(i,jfalse)$$ {y}_{n,0}\left(i,j\right) $$. For ()–(), applying lemma 2 in Reference 28, if truenormalΦ7<1$$ \left\Vert {\overline{\Phi}}_7\right\Vert <1 $$ is satisfied, there is normallim supk+Ēkfalse(jfalse)bĒ,2.56804ptj=1,2,,T2.$$ \underset{k\to +\infty }{\lim\ \sup}\left\Vert {\bar{E}}_k(j)\right\Vert \le {b}_{\bar{E}},j=1,2,\dots, {T}_2. $$ From () and (), for n=1,2,,N$$ n=1,2,\dots, N $$, i=1,2,,T1$$ i=1,2,\dots, {T}_1 $$, and j=1,2,,T2$$ j=1,2,\dots, {T}_2 $$, we have <...…”
Section: Ilc Analysis With Robust Tracking and Perfect Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we know that δxkfalse(0,jfalse)$$ \left\Vert \delta {x}_k\left(0,j\right)\right\Vert $$, δxkfalse(i,0false)$$ \left\Vert \delta {x}_k\left(i,0\right)\right\Vert $$, δtrueXkfalse(0false)$$ \left\Vert \delta {\overline{X}}_k(0)\right\Vert $$, δtrueWkfalse(jprefix−1false),2.41927ptδtrueYkdfalse(jfalse)$$ \left\Vert \delta {\overline{W}}_k\left(j-1\right)\right\Vert, \left\Vert \delta {\overline{Y}}_k^d(j)\right\Vert $$, and δtrueVkfalse(jfalse)$$ \left\Vert \delta {\overline{V}}_k(j)\right\Vert $$ are bounded. For ()–(), applying lemma 2 in Reference 28, if truenormalΨ˜6=truenormalΨ8<1$$ {\tilde{\Psi}}_6=\left\Vert {\overline{\Psi}}_8\right\Vert <1 $$ is satisfied, there is normallim supk+truetrueζ¯k+1false(j+1false)btruetrueζ¯,3.0235ptj=1,2,,T2,$$ \underset{k\to +\infty }{\lim\ \sup}\left\Vert {\overline{\overline{\zeta}}}_{k+1}\left(j+1\right)\right\Vert \le {b}_{\overline{\overline{\zeta...…”
Section: Extension To the Lsis With Finite Subsystems Described By 2‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%