2022
DOI: 10.1002/acs.3506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust decentralized iterative learning control for large‐scale interconnected systems described by 2‐D Fornasini–Marchesini systems with iteration‐dependent uncertainties including boundary states, disturbances, and reference trajectory

Abstract: This article first investigates robust iterative learning control (ILC) problem of a class of large-scale interconnected systems, which consist of many subsystems described by two-dimensional linear discrete first Fornasini-Marchesini systems with iteration-dependent uncertainties arising from not only boundary states, disturbances, but also reference trajectory. A decentralized P-type ILC law without any information exchanges with other subsystems is proposed such that the ultimate ILC tracking error of each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is worth pointing out that Assumption 2 may be difficult to achieve in some cases, because it is usually hard to determine the unique desired input u d (i, j) for the 2-D reference trajectory. To avoid using the Assumption 2, an alternative analysis approach for ILC is to directly consider the tracking errors e k (i + 1, j + 1) and e k+1 (i + 1, j + 1) in [9] and [24]. Assumption 3: Let the reference trajectory y d,k (i, j), system parameters A 1,k (i + 1, j), A 2,k (i, j), A 3,k (i, j + 1), B k (i, j) and C k (i, j), boundary states x k (i, 0) and x k (0, j) be the progressively convergent, i.e.,…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth pointing out that Assumption 2 may be difficult to achieve in some cases, because it is usually hard to determine the unique desired input u d (i, j) for the 2-D reference trajectory. To avoid using the Assumption 2, an alternative analysis approach for ILC is to directly consider the tracking errors e k (i + 1, j + 1) and e k+1 (i + 1, j + 1) in [9] and [24]. Assumption 3: Let the reference trajectory y d,k (i, j), system parameters A 1,k (i + 1, j), A 2,k (i, j), A 3,k (i, j + 1), B k (i, j) and C k (i, j), boundary states x k (i, 0) and x k (0, j) be the progressively convergent, i.e.,…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%