2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Bang-Off-Bang Low-Thrust Guidance Using Model Predictive Static Programming

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, links between carbon metabolism and other cellular processes have been reported, for example, via nitrogen fixation by PTS, the stress response, starvation, and pathogenicity ( Lodget and Jacobson, 1988 ; Rabus et al, 1999 ; Gaurivaud et al, 2000 ; Ueguchi et al, 2001 ). Similarly, OF significantly reduced the synthesis of L-glutamate, which is not only a precursor of glutamine, proline, arginine, and lysine, but also a participant in the urea cycle ( Wang and Topputo, 2020 ). Meanwhile, we found that the levels of L-glutamate-related metabolites (2-oxoarginine, anserine, and γ-glutamyl-β-aminopropiononitrile) were significantly increased (25.67-, 13.80-, and 25.04-fold, respectively, versus the control group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, links between carbon metabolism and other cellular processes have been reported, for example, via nitrogen fixation by PTS, the stress response, starvation, and pathogenicity ( Lodget and Jacobson, 1988 ; Rabus et al, 1999 ; Gaurivaud et al, 2000 ; Ueguchi et al, 2001 ). Similarly, OF significantly reduced the synthesis of L-glutamate, which is not only a precursor of glutamine, proline, arginine, and lysine, but also a participant in the urea cycle ( Wang and Topputo, 2020 ). Meanwhile, we found that the levels of L-glutamate-related metabolites (2-oxoarginine, anserine, and γ-glutamyl-β-aminopropiononitrile) were significantly increased (25.67-, 13.80-, and 25.04-fold, respectively, versus the control group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%