2019
DOI: 10.1017/s026357471900050x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Active Disturbance Rejection Control For Flexible Link Manipulator

Abstract: SummaryThis paper presents an advanced robust active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) for flexible link manipulator (FLM) to track desired trajectories in the joint space and minimize the link’s vibrations. It has been shown that the ADRC technique has a very good disturbance rejection capability. Both the internal dynamics and the external disturbances can be estimated and compensated in real time. The proposed robust ADRC control law is developed to solve the problems existing in the original version of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pradhan and Subudhi (2020) proposed a nonlinear self-tuning PID controller to control the joint position and link deflection of the FLM subjected to varying payloads. Fareh et al (2020) presented robust active disturbance rejection control for FLM to solve joint trajectories tracking control problem and minimize the link's vibrations. Xu et al (2018) proposed a second order non-singular terminal sliding mode optimal control technique for a two-link flexible manipulator with uncertain model parameters.…”
Section: Model-free Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pradhan and Subudhi (2020) proposed a nonlinear self-tuning PID controller to control the joint position and link deflection of the FLM subjected to varying payloads. Fareh et al (2020) presented robust active disturbance rejection control for FLM to solve joint trajectories tracking control problem and minimize the link's vibrations. Xu et al (2018) proposed a second order non-singular terminal sliding mode optimal control technique for a two-link flexible manipulator with uncertain model parameters.…”
Section: Model-free Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Active disturbance rejection control technique has an excellent disturbance rejection capability (Fareh et al, 2020) • Disadvantages (a) There is a problem of input delay in the feedback loop because the estimations of the system states are calculated based on the sensor reading.…”
Section: Model-free Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M is a Hurwitz matrix and G(η) is bounded, η ∈ R n , and M ∈ R n×n , the error η is uniformly ultimately bounded [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Theorem 1 Suppose a General Error Dynamic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose a general error dynamic system where is a Hurwitz matrix and is bounded, , and , the error is uniformly ultimately bounded [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Control System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ADRC is subjected to two major problems, i.e., the disturbance estimation errors and parameter variations, which cannot be included in the lumped disturbance and then estimated with the extended observer. The estimation errors of the lumped disturbance are commonly neglected, while parameter variations of the control input are not considered [43]. As revealed from the former analysis, the sliding mode control exhibits insensitivity to external disturbance and parameter perturbation, which can remedy the defect of ADRC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%