2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3043247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Terminal Traction Control of Teleoperation Manipulator With Random Jitter Disturbance Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Sliding Mode Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to verify the performance of the proposed controller. In the follow-up experiment, the comparison algorithms adopted consisted of the computed torque controller (CTC) [33], the computed torque controller based on radial basis function (RBF) neural network compensation (CTC-RBF) [34], the terminal sliding mode controller based on the computed torque controller (CTC-NTSMC) [35], the active disturbance rejection sliding mode controller (ADRSMC) [36], as well as the proposed controller.…”
Section: Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to verify the performance of the proposed controller. In the follow-up experiment, the comparison algorithms adopted consisted of the computed torque controller (CTC) [33], the computed torque controller based on radial basis function (RBF) neural network compensation (CTC-RBF) [34], the terminal sliding mode controller based on the computed torque controller (CTC-NTSMC) [35], the active disturbance rejection sliding mode controller (ADRSMC) [36], as well as the proposed controller.…”
Section: Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following section, the proposed controller and other four comparative controllers were applied to the tele‐aiming and tracking control of uniform moving target and non‐uniform moving target (manoeuvring target with random offset motion) to verify the performance of the proposed controller. In the follow‐up experiment, the comparison algorithms adopted consisted of the computed torque controller (CTC) [33], the computed torque controller based on radial basis function (RBF) neural network compensation (CTC‐RBF) [34], the terminal sliding mode controller based on the computed torque controller (CTC‐NTSMC) [35], the active disturbance rejection sliding mode controller (ADRSMC) [36], as well as the proposed controller.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed in the literature concerning how to control the delayed teleoperation systems [2]. The sliding mode control was proposed as a promising approach, especially when integrated with other methods such as impedance control for the purpose of force control [3] or when used as a means of disturbance rejection [4]. Adaptive control methods have also been widely used in teleoperation systems [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further improve the response speed and disturbance immunity of the system, some modern control theories such as fuzzy control, adaptive control [9], self-turbulence control [10], neural networks [11], and sliding mode control [12,13] have been successfully applied to the speed control of PMSM. Among them, sliding mode control (SMC) is widely used because of its robustness, fast dynamic response, and easy implementation [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%