2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11041850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robotic Precisely Oocyte Blind Enucleation Method

Abstract: Oocyte enucleation is a critical procedure for somatic cell nuclear transfer. Yet, the main steps of oocyte enucleation are still manually operated, which presents several drawbacks such as low precision, high repetition error, and long training time for operators. For improving the operation efficiency and success rate, a robotic precise oocyte blind enucleation method is presented in this paper. The proposed method involves the following key techniques: oocyte translation control, oocyte immobilization and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the process suffers from low efficiency and reproducibility. Manual methods require >1 min per cell (not including locating or retrieving the sample) and suffer from high variability (standard deviation of ±30% of original total volume removed) and low viability (∼40%) . While efforts have been made to use robotically controlled micropipettes and/or computer vision to automate and enhance processes such as enucleation, microfluidic methods offer a unique advantage in facilitating high precision and high throughput enucleation procedures.…”
Section: Sectioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the process suffers from low efficiency and reproducibility. Manual methods require >1 min per cell (not including locating or retrieving the sample) and suffer from high variability (standard deviation of ±30% of original total volume removed) and low viability (∼40%) . While efforts have been made to use robotically controlled micropipettes and/or computer vision to automate and enhance processes such as enucleation, microfluidic methods offer a unique advantage in facilitating high precision and high throughput enucleation procedures.…”
Section: Sectioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oocyte penetration experiments were performed on the NK-MR601 micromanipulation system [22][23][24], as shown in Figure 1. The system consists of an inverted microscope (CK-40, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), a CCD camera (W-V-460, Panasonic, Osaka, Japan, frame rate: 20 frames/s), a motorized X-Y stage (travel range: 100 mm, repeatability: 1 µm/s, maximum speed: 2 mm/s), and two X-Y-Z micro-manipulators (travel range: 50 mm, repeatability: 1 µm/s, maximum speed: 1 mm/s); a micro-injector provides the negative pressure to hold the oocyte (−3~0 kPa); a motion control box controls the motorized stage, motorized micro-manipulators, and micro-injector through the host computer.…”
Section: System Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual methods require >1 min per cell (not including locating or retrieving the sample) and suffer from high variability (standard deviation of ±30% of original total volume removed) and low viability (~40%). 153 While efforts have been made to use robotically controlled micropipettes and/or computer vision to automate and enhance processes such as enucleation, [153][154][155] microfluidic methods offer a unique advantage in facilitating high precision and high throughput enucleation procedures. The first approach of enucleation is to use solid tools to separate and pinch off the nucleus from the oocyte mechanically inside a microfluidic channel.…”
Section: Enucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%