Concise Encyclopedia of Traffic &Amp; Transportation Systems 1991
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-036203-8.50085-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road Traffic Control: TRANSYT and SCOOT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They usually prioritize a unidirectional main flow (e.g. in-or out-bound rush-hour traffic in 'arterials') [79]. Some obvious disadvantages of this classical control approach are:…”
Section: The Classical Control Approach and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They usually prioritize a unidirectional main flow (e.g. in-or out-bound rush-hour traffic in 'arterials') [79]. Some obvious disadvantages of this classical control approach are:…”
Section: The Classical Control Approach and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They usually prioritize a unidirectional main flow (e.g. in-or out-bound rush-hour traffic in "arterials") [79].…”
Section: The Classical Control Approach and Its Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCOOT is actually the traffic-responsive version of TRANSYT (Robertson, 1969), which is the most popular co-ordinated fixed-time strategy (McDonald and Hounsell, 1991). SCOOT utilises traffic measurements upstream of the network junctions.…”
Section: Co-ordinated Traffic-responsive Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%