River management under transformation: The emergence of strategic adaptive management of river systems in the Kruger National Park

Abstract

Protected areas such as the Kruger National Park (KNP) face many management challenges, of which ensuring a healthy flow of rivers into the park is one of the most important. Although previous management policies isolated the KNP from its neighbours, this position has changed as the KNP seeks to negotiate a respected ‘place’ for water and conservation in a competitive environment. A major catalyst for this re-orientation has been the response from the KNP to the growing water crisis where its position needed to be seen within the wider catchment and policy context in South Africa. This paper presents an overview of the transforming management practices of the KNP in a changing political, socio-economic and environmental context, through the lens of water resources. We show that the KNP management model moved beyond inward-looking, isolationist policies to adopt responsivity to major change factors. The new approach was applied first in the sphere of river management in the KNP after which it spread to other domains such as fire and game management. It explicitly incorporates an experimental–reflexive orientation and considers management as a process of learningby- doing. This paper strives to review the transformation since the onset of explicit adaptive management of these rivers. The development of a new stewardship, based on a stakeholdercentred vision and on learning-focused management, has been a main achievement for the KNP. A closer partnership between researchers, managers and field staff, supported with buyin and co-learning, has led to a management framework based on a clear vision informed by stakeholder involvement, an objectives hierarchy, a scoping of management options, a monitoring system and a reflective evaluation process with feedback loops. Although developed through a focus on rivers, the framework can be embraced for the management of ecosystems as a whole.<p><strong>Conservation implications:</strong> The explicit adoption of strategic adaptive management for the rivers entering the KNP has had considerable implications not only with regard to management practice within the park, but also for the relationships with neighbours. This has also meant setting and implementing new goals and priorities with managers and staff.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article:</strong> Pollard, S., Du Toit, D. & Biggs, H., 2011, ‘River management under transformation: The emergence of strategic adaptive management of river systems in the Kruger National Park’, <em>Koedoe</em> 53(2), Art. #1011, 14 pages. doi:10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1011</p&gt

Using flow guilds of freshwater fish in an adaptive management framework to simplify environmental flow delivery for semi‐arid riverine systems

“…The framework provided a structured way to improve the understanding of a system, and ultimately system management, within the context of qualitative objectives being transformed into quantitative management outcomes (Pollard and DuToit ; Pollard et al . ).…”

Drivers of spatial and temporal variability of streamflow in the Incomati River basin

“…A substantial part of the basin has been declared a conservation area, which includes the recently established Greater Limpopo Transfrontier Park (the Kruger National Park in South Africa and the Limpopo National Park in Mozambique are part of it) (TPTC, 2010). The level of water abstraction in the Incomati River is very high, and the actual water demand is projected to increase in the future, as a result of further economic development and population growth (Nkomo and van der Zaag, 2004;LeMarie et al, 2006;Pollard et al, 2011). The consumptive use of surface water amounts to more than 1880 million cubic metres per annum (10 6 m 3 a −1 ), which represents 51 % of the average amount of surface water generated in the basin (Van der Zaag and Vaz, 2003).…”

Challenges to Implementing an Environmental Flow Regime in the Luvuvhu River Catchment, South Africa

“…Implementation of sustainable catchment management strategies requires proper governance systems that ensure that CMAs gain adequate understanding of catchment water availability and land use impact within their water management areas [36]. To enhance stakeholders (local communities) engagement, environmental flow priority-setting and related benefits from their application should be communicated from a political and socio-economic water resource perspective [32]. A transparent, inclusive and well–coordinated stakeholder dialogue helps to popularize the notion that mankind does benefit from environmental and ecological flow regimes through a number of important silent services such as tourism, fishing, water retention and storage, and water supply and purification [34,36].…”

“…In total, 480 publications were identified and those which were closely related to the topic and peer-reviewed were included. We excluded studies that focused only on ecological management, ecological impact and water quality that did not relate to water and catchment management, respectively [32].…”