1995
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970150806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk‐based prenatal screening for trisomy 18 using alpha‐fetoprotein, unconjugated oestriol and human chorionic gonadotropin

Abstract: Nine centres collaborated to examine the feasibility of a screening method for trisomy 18 that was based on assigning individual risk, using a combination of maternal age and measurements of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), unconjugated oestriol (uE3), and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Second-trimester measurements of these analytes were obtained from 94 trisomy 18 pregnancies. In the 89 pregnancies without an associated open defect, the median levels for AFP, uE3, and hCG were 0.65, 0.43 and 0.36 multiples of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
71
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
71
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While using a risk threshold of Z1 in 100, as demonstrated by Palomaki et al, the sensitivity was unchanged but the FPR was lower and equivalent to other populations. 3 As the prevalence of trisomy 18 is low, estimates of sensitivity are not as robust as for Down's syndrome. This study has demonstrated that the trisomy 18 algorithm needs to be monitored for this population and may need adjusting, once more data are examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While using a risk threshold of Z1 in 100, as demonstrated by Palomaki et al, the sensitivity was unchanged but the FPR was lower and equivalent to other populations. 3 As the prevalence of trisomy 18 is low, estimates of sensitivity are not as robust as for Down's syndrome. This study has demonstrated that the trisomy 18 algorithm needs to be monitored for this population and may need adjusting, once more data are examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 A study examining cases and controls to estimate the test characteristics of the triple test for trisomy 18 showed a higher sensitivity of 60% with a 0.2% FPR. 3 However, these studies select cases on the basis of a known pregnancy outcome matched with a control and are biased towards trisomy 18 cases that are detected because of congenital abnormalities. Thus, they may result in an over-estimate of the test characteristics than can actually be achieved in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Published algorithms are available that estimate an individual pregnancy's risk of trisomy 18. 25 Usually the false-positive rate is kept at 0.3% or lower, and the corresponding detection rate using maternal age in combination with AFP, uE3, and hCG measurements is about 70%. Maternal weight correction is an important component of trisomy 18 screening.…”
Section: Ds3861 Trisomy 18 (Edward Syndrome)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Following the introduction of maternal serum screening for fetal Down syndrome, it was noted that fetal trisomy 18 (Edward syndrome) is associated with decreased levels of all three screening analytes, 3 making screening for trisomy 18 feasible within a Down syndrome screening program. 5,6 Besides the chromosomal constitution of the fetus, a variety of other factors are known or thought to influence marker concentrations, for example maternal weight, smoking habits 7 ethnic origin, 8 twins, 9 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus 10 and multigravidity. 11,12 Adjustment for such factors is necessary to avoid erroneous individual risk estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%