Plant Breeding Reviews: Volume 38 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118916865.ch05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice Breeding in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both methods, the first three generations are conducted in a single location under good environmental conditions (Santo Antonio de Goi as, GO). Currently, the modified pedigree method achieves a yield gain of 2.66% per cycle (Martinez et al, 2014), but it has a tendency to reduce drought tolerance (Pinheiro et al, 2006;Silveira et al, 2015). This implies in exposing the progenies to different local weather conditions, including F I G U R E 6 Cumulative probability density function (CDF) and frequencies of occurrence for upland rice stress profiles (SP) in the historical period (top row) and in 2,050 for RCP 2.6 (middle row) and RCP 8.5 (bottom row) for all three environment groups: least favorable environment (LFE, left column), favorable environment (FE, middle column), and highly favorable environment (HFE, right column).…”
Section: Breeding Implications Of Changes In Environment Groups Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In both methods, the first three generations are conducted in a single location under good environmental conditions (Santo Antonio de Goi as, GO). Currently, the modified pedigree method achieves a yield gain of 2.66% per cycle (Martinez et al, 2014), but it has a tendency to reduce drought tolerance (Pinheiro et al, 2006;Silveira et al, 2015). This implies in exposing the progenies to different local weather conditions, including F I G U R E 6 Cumulative probability density function (CDF) and frequencies of occurrence for upland rice stress profiles (SP) in the historical period (top row) and in 2,050 for RCP 2.6 (middle row) and RCP 8.5 (bottom row) for all three environment groups: least favorable environment (LFE, left column), favorable environment (FE, middle column), and highly favorable environment (HFE, right column).…”
Section: Breeding Implications Of Changes In Environment Groups Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primavera) occurred in the breeding program, whereas in the late 1990s, wide hybridizations were carried out, introducing indica genes into a predominant japonica background with a significant increase in yield potential especially under highly favorable conditions (Martinez et al, 2014). While Primavera is currently used as a check cultivar in the conventional breeding program and is hence representative of genotypes released to the public, clearly, as a result of the breeding process at Embrapa, changes have occurred and will continue to occur in the characteristics of the germplasm released and grown by farmers in the last 30-40 years, leading to the changes in the environments and stress patterns.…”
Section: Breeding Implications Of Changes In Environment Groups Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the end of the 1980s, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) has used this method in its rice breeding program (Martínez et al, 2014). For autogamous species, most breeding programs develop endogamic lines (cultivars) originating from biparental populations, so that self-fertilization from F 2 allows a limited recombination; therefore, some favorable genic combinations are maintained at very low frequencies, which makes selection impossible (Ramalho et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%