2016
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisiting tourist behavior via destination brand worldness

Abstract: Taking tourists' perspective rather than destination offerings as its core concept, this study introduces "perceived destination brand worldness" as a variable. Perceived destination brand worldness is defined as the positive perception that a tourist has of a country that is visited by tourists from all over the world. Then, the relationship between perceived destination brand worldness and intention to revisit is analyzed using partial least squares regression. This empirical study selects Taiwanese tourists… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then; how can we build a global brand for a destination? This study advances prior study (Kayak & Simoni, 2016) by investigating the mediating effect of destination brand worldness. Destination practitioners could formulate and implement worldness strategies in their destinations to attract more travelers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then; how can we build a global brand for a destination? This study advances prior study (Kayak & Simoni, 2016) by investigating the mediating effect of destination brand worldness. Destination practitioners could formulate and implement worldness strategies in their destinations to attract more travelers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This study adopts four-item scales for destination brand prestige from Vigneron & Johnson (1999), adopts five-item scales for destination brand worldness from Kayak and Simoni (2016), and adopts three-item scales for intention to revisit from Horng et al, (2012); Kim et al, (2009). Measurement items are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation