2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2020.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing evidence of LGBTQ+ discrimination and exclusion in sport

Abstract: Sport organisations continue to place a low priority on addressing the exclusion and discrimination experienced by LGBTQ+ people (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, questioning/queer, and sexual/gender diverse). It was previously thought this was due to a lack of quantitative evidence of a problem; however, over the past decade, a large body of quantitative research has been conducted, including two international studies, providing strong evidence that discriminatory behaviour remains common in sport and is harmfu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, one-fifth of all respondents felt excluded from or refrained from participating in sports. These results are within the range of findings identified elsewhere (e.g., Denison et al, 2020;Kavoura & Kokkonen, 2020). However, comparisons of concrete frequencies and percentages are problematic because studies use different designs and time references for the questionnaires.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, one-fifth of all respondents felt excluded from or refrained from participating in sports. These results are within the range of findings identified elsewhere (e.g., Denison et al, 2020;Kavoura & Kokkonen, 2020). However, comparisons of concrete frequencies and percentages are problematic because studies use different designs and time references for the questionnaires.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…At the same time, international research on LGBTQ+ individuals in sports has increased over the last decade, particularly in Anglophone countries. There is growing empirical evidence that LGBTQ+ people regularly experience discrimination and exclusion in sports (Denison, Bevan, & Jeanes, 2020;Kavoura & Kokkonen, 2020). However, there is a dearth of research on the situation of LGBTQ+ athletes in Germany (Krell & Oldemeier, 2018;Schweer, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability, as it occurs in the educational context according to Smith (2019a) , may happen due to the use of different conceptual criteria on the phenomenon and dissimilar methodological elements used in each of the studies ( Vveinhardt and Fominiene, 2019 ). In relation to the risk factors of becoming a victim of bullying in sport, the presentation of some type of disability ( Danes-Staples et al, 2013 ), being overweight ( Bacchini et al, 2015 ), belonging to ethnic minorities ( Kentel and McHugh, 2015 ), the sexual orientation -homophobic bullying- ( Baiocco et al, 2018 ; Denison et al, 2020 ) or having poor sport skills ( Kerr et al, 2016 ; Mishna et al, 2019 ; Vveinhardt et al, 2019b ; Flores et al, 2020 ) stand out. Boys present higher rates of aggression, but not victimization ( Evans et al, 2016 ; Vveinhardt and Fominiene, 2019 ), the typology of verbal bullying is the most frequent and the changing room is the sport space where more bullying situations appear ( Mishna et al, 2019 ; Nery et al, 2019 ; Flores et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that happier individuals are more tolerant and express more gratitude, creating a gentler psychosocial environment, but this is not the same as creating settings based on fairness and equity. There is abundant evidence that many social structures perpetuate discrimination against people with disabilities, ethnic minorities, and LGBTQ individuals (Prilleltensky and Nelson, 2002 ; Denison et al, 2020 ; Prilleltensky and Prilleltensky, 2021 ). Some of the barriers to the well-being of these individuals are not interpersonal, but structural.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%