Review on greenhouse gas emissions from pig houses: Production of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide by animals and manure

Abstract

A B S T R A C TThe environmental impacts of livestock production are attracting increasing attention, especially the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Currently, pork is the most widely consumed meat product in the world, and its production is expected to grow in the next few decades. This paper deals with the production of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) by animals and by manure from pig buildings, with a focus on the influence of rearing techniques and nutrition. GHG emissions in piggeries originate from animals through CO 2 exhalation and CH 4 enteric fermentation, and from manure through the release of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O. The level of the CO 2 exhalation (E-CO 2, pig ) depends on the physiological stage, the body weight (BW), the production level and the feed intake of the animals concerned. Enteric CH 4 (E-CH 4, pig ) is principally related to dietary fibre intake and the fermentative capacity of the pig's hindgut. Based on a review of the literature, the following equations are proposed in order to estimate E-CO 2, pig (in kg day À1) and E-CH 4,pig (in g day À1 ) for fattening pigs: E-CO 2,; E-CH 4,pig = 0.012 Â dRes; with BW (in kg) and dRes for digestible residues (in g day À1 ). Numerous pathways are responsible for GHG production in manure. In addition, the microbial, physical and chemical properties of manure interact and modulate the level of emissions. Influencing factors for removal systems for both liquid and solid fractions of manure have been investigated. A large range of parameters showing an impact on the level of GHG production from pig houses has been reported. However, few of these can be considered unquestionably as GHG mitigation techniques because some strategies have shown contradictory effects depending on the gas, the circumstances and the study. Nevertheless, frequent manure removal seems to be an efficient means to reduce concurrently CO 2 -, CH 4 -and N 2 O-emissions from pig buildings for both slatted and bedded floor systems. Manure removal operations may be associated with specific storage conditions and efficient treatment in order to further reduce emissions. Several feeding strategies have been tested to decrease GHG emissions but they seem to be ineffective in reducing emissions both significantly and durably. In general, good management practices that enhance zootechnical performance will have beneficial consequences on GHG emission intensity. Taking into account the results described in the literature regarding CO 2 -, CH 4 -and N 2 Oproduction from animals and manure in pig houses, we estimate total GHG emissions to 448.3 kg CO 2 equiv. per slaughter pig produced or 4.87 kg CO 2 equiv. per kg carcass. The fattening period accounts for more than 70% of total emissions, while the gestation, lactation and weaning periods each contribute to about 10% of total emissions. Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O contribute to 81, 17 and 2% of total emissions from pig buildings, representing 3.87, 0.83 and 0.11 kg CO 2 equiv. per kg carcass, re...

Using the product environmental footprint for supply chain management: lessons learned from a case study on pork

“…limiting the contact time between manure and atmospheric air. N 2 O, methane and CO 2 emissions were calculated based on a review study (Philippe and Nicks 2014). NO X emission was taken into account by combining the N content of the liquid manure with a fixed emission factor (Bengoa et al 2014).…”

Zoning of environmental conditions inside a wean-to-finish pig facility

“…Thus, one can observe that the highest contents of NH3 are linked directly to higher RH, as noted by MEDEIROS et al (2014) in swine facilities. The emission levels of both CO2 and NH3 are similar to pigs in the F phase, while the corresponding values for the other categories vary more, especially for weaned piglets (PHILIPPE & NICKS, 2015;PHILIPPE et al, 2011).…”

“…Gaseous emissions are positively related to temperature and ventilation rates (PHILIPPE & NICKS, 2015) and, therefore, fans must be installed at strategic positions to assist air renovation as well as maintenance of its quality. According to Figure 4 (a), milder temperatures are in the bottom, stretching to the central area of the barn, and largely than the last analyzed kriging map.…”

Acoustic Environment and Gas Production in Different Growing-Finishing Swine Facilities

“…According to PHILIPPE & NICKS (2015), CO2 emissions are due primarily to animal metabolism (respiratory rate and body heat production) and to a lesser extent, to the volume coming from waste degradation. LUZ et al (2015) state that in heat stress situations animals resort to thermolysis through evaporation; in the case of swine, through increasing respiratory frequency.…”