2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of water quality criteria for water reuse and risk-based implications for irrigated produce under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, produce safety rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the continued use of E. coli to assess food safety risks associated with preharvest surface water use (California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement, 2017; Food and Drug Administration, 2015; Jones and Shortt, 2010; Rock et al, 2018), understanding the associations between specific environmental factors and the relationship between E. coli levels and pathogen contamination of surface water is critical. As such, we used two-way PDPs to identify potential associations between the likelihood of detecting foodborne pathogens in AZ and NY waterways, and two-way interactions between environmental factors and E. coli levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the continued use of E. coli to assess food safety risks associated with preharvest surface water use (California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement, 2017; Food and Drug Administration, 2015; Jones and Shortt, 2010; Rock et al, 2018), understanding the associations between specific environmental factors and the relationship between E. coli levels and pathogen contamination of surface water is critical. As such, we used two-way PDPs to identify potential associations between the likelihood of detecting foodborne pathogens in AZ and NY waterways, and two-way interactions between environmental factors and E. coli levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For safe human contact, it is recommended that recreational waters have a geometric mean (GM) below 35 CFU/100 mL for Enterococci and below 126 CFU/100 mL for E. coli, as specified by the Recreational Water Quality Criteria from the U.S. EPA [3]. This limit (126 CFU/100 mL) is identical to the hazard threshold set by the Food and Drug Administration for the irrigation of fresh produce according to the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) [6]. In drinking water, the maximum level is set at 1 CFU/100 mL for E. coli [5], which is near the detection limit of many detection systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of surface water, which includes lakes, rivers, ponds, springs, and creeks, fluctuates due to wastewater discharge, agricultural or urban runoff, domesticated and wild animal intrusion, human waste, and other contributing factors [14]. Consequently, the use of surface water is considered a higher risk practice than groundwater [30], which, when properly managed is less prone to contamination [14]. Reclaimed water is sourced from domestic or industrial wastewater that receives treatment and disinfection [19].…”
Section: Water As a Vehicle For Foodborne Pathogen Transmission Durinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, a quantitative microbial risk assessment was conducted to identify potential contamination risks associated with foodborne pathogens on lettuce using different irrigation systems applying water in compliance with the PSR standards. Results showed that the risks of developing gastrointestinal (GI) illnesses when the water contains 126 CFU generic E. coli/100 mL corresponds to 0.000009% for subsurface irrigation systems, 0.0011% for furrow and 0.11% for sprinkler systems [30]. While the risk of illness from consuming lettuce containing 126 CFU generic E. coli/100 mL seems relatively low, several other factors should be taken into consideration when examining the risks of foodborne illness.…”
Section: Microbial Indicators Of Irrigation Water Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%