1973
DOI: 10.1126/science.180.4088.878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrograde State Dependent Learning

Abstract: Sodium pentobarbital administered intravenously after acquisition in a one-trial passive avoidance task results in state dependent (drug dissociated) learning in male albino rats. Findings have methodological implications for drug-based research and theoretical implications for drug discrimination studies. Predictions based on a stimulus generalization hypothesis are not supported, whereas those based on an information storage hypothesis are supported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the former two groups as well as the latter two displayed comparable overall response rates during extinction. These results can be interpreted in terms of a symmetrical retrograde state dependency resembling that discussed by Chute and Wright (1973) for a one-trial passive avoidance task in which rats received sodium pentobarbital intravenously following response acquisition. Their data supported the hypothesis that for transfer of training from acquisition to the retention test to be possible, information storage following acquisition trials and information retrieval during retention trials must occur under equivalent central nervous system states.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At the same time, the former two groups as well as the latter two displayed comparable overall response rates during extinction. These results can be interpreted in terms of a symmetrical retrograde state dependency resembling that discussed by Chute and Wright (1973) for a one-trial passive avoidance task in which rats received sodium pentobarbital intravenously following response acquisition. Their data supported the hypothesis that for transfer of training from acquisition to the retention test to be possible, information storage following acquisition trials and information retrieval during retention trials must occur under equivalent central nervous system states.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Although I may have subscribed to a notion of state effects on memory (e.g. Chute and Wright 1973), there are many psychologists who might believe this to be a "pharmacological curiosity," and that Dismukes has found a physiological substrate as an "answer" where unfortunately there is no "question." Dismukes correctly points out the potential importance to animal behaviour and psychiatric disorders of work on transmitters and peptides.…”
Section: By W* Dale Branton and Eari Hayerimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is little evidence that posttrial administration of pentobarbital, a traditional statedependent agent, influences memory retrieval, although administration of this drug prior to training readily produces a strong state-dependent retention effect (Overton, 1964(Overton, , 1978. It should be noted that a state-dependentlike effect has been reported when pentobarbital was administered following passive avoidance training (Chute & Wright, 1973), but that finding seems to be an isolated one. Given the delays over which retrograde amnesia can Copyright 1986 Psychonomic Society, Inc. be obtained (e.g., Riccio et al, 1968), and the relatively rapid onset of physiological changes produced by pentobarbital, it seems doubtful that these negative findings can be attributed to an unduly long functional interval between training and drug action.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%