2008
DOI: 10.5589/m08-046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna®)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
129
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Stand basal area estimates by the laser-relascope [38] have a better relative error of 2% compared to the traditional relascope [39], after correcting for tree occlusions, which was not done for Relasphone measurements in Finland. Yao et al [40] reported R 2 = 0.66 (lower than the Relasphone results in Finland) for plot-level basal area estimation with TLS, but a slightly better agreement for biomass (R 2 = 0.85), similar to the best results for pine and total stem volume in Mexico.…”
Section: Relasphone Measurements Versus Other Forest Mensuration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stand basal area estimates by the laser-relascope [38] have a better relative error of 2% compared to the traditional relascope [39], after correcting for tree occlusions, which was not done for Relasphone measurements in Finland. Yao et al [40] reported R 2 = 0.66 (lower than the Relasphone results in Finland) for plot-level basal area estimation with TLS, but a slightly better agreement for biomass (R 2 = 0.85), similar to the best results for pine and total stem volume in Mexico.…”
Section: Relasphone Measurements Versus Other Forest Mensuration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of dendrometers, including the laser relascope, were surveyed in [34]. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was used for automatic measuring of forest inventory parameters, including tree height and tree diameter at breast height (dbh) [35][36][37], basal area [38,39] and forest structure and biomass [40], with good accuracy on basal area estimations [39]. However, TLS is expensive, not easily portable and requires an expertly-trained operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When laser pulses emitted in the visible or near-infrared comes into contact with an object, part of that energy is reflected back toward the instrument and triggers the recording of its distance and intensity [12]. TLS systems typically employ vertical and horizontal scanning about a fixed point of observation, providing a hemispherical representation of biomass distribution in the forest leaves, branches and trunks, which allows exploring foliage angle distributions and clumping [3,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology has proven highly useful for estimating total aboveground biomass and providing detailed vertical profiles of forest environments [3,12,13]. Terrestrial Laser Scanner measurements are generally mounted on a survey tripod about 1.5 m above the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in correlation with automated processing algorithms, is a promising technology. It can produce a highly accurate model for evaluating main tree attributes, such as height, curvature of stem, canopy cover and stem density (Hopkinson et al 2004), stem locations and DBH (Maas et al 2008;Strahler et al 2008;Huang et al 2011;Liang et al 2014). However, there are two main drawbacks there.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%