1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00155028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal and retinocortical times to pattern stimulation in amblyopic children

Abstract: In order to determine whether in amblyopes retinal conduction delays contribute to the cortical measureable delays in the visual evoked cortical potential (VECP), peak latencies of the pattern electroretinogram (ERG) are measured in amblyopic children. The results are compared with those of the normal fellow eyes and those of a healthy control group. Simultaneously the latencies in the VECP are recorded and the determination of the retinocortical times is performed. Statistically retinal b-wave (Q) and a-wave … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in agreement with those in another study. 19 However, although simultaneous PERG and VEP recordings were performed in a preceding study, 10 RCT was not evaluated. Therefore, apart from the data proposed by Teping et al, 19 there is no further information in the literature regarding postretinal neural conduction in AM patients.…”
Section: Neural Conduction Along Postretinal Visual Pathways: Rct Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in agreement with those in another study. 19 However, although simultaneous PERG and VEP recordings were performed in a preceding study, 10 RCT was not evaluated. Therefore, apart from the data proposed by Teping et al, 19 there is no further information in the literature regarding postretinal neural conduction in AM patients.…”
Section: Neural Conduction Along Postretinal Visual Pathways: Rct Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were many studies on patients with amblyopia in P-ERG changes, but results still remained inconsistent. Tepping et al [21], Guttob et al [15] and Hess et al [16] found no signi cant difference between amblyopic eyes and the normal control eyes in either amplitude or latency of P 50 and N 95 . Tugcu B et al [13] and Arden et al [14], using the same stimulation patterns, found that among patients with amblyopia, there were no signi cant differences in the amblyopic eyes' P-ERG latency compared to the fellow eyes, but P 50 amplitude in the amblyopic eyes declined signi cantly when compared to the normal control eyes, indicating the decline of retinal ganglion cell function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, most of the previous studies that were conducted using transient PERG found a reduction in the amplitude with an increase in the latency of the response in the amblyopic eye compared to the control eye, 26 , 55 whereas other investigators showed no difference between the healthy control group and amblyopic eyes as regards both amplitude and latency. 10 , 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%