Rethinking the rise of the German Constitutional Court: From anti-Nazism to value formalism

Abstract

The German Constitutional Court, we often hear, draws its considerable strength from the reaction to the German Nazi past:Because the Nazis abused rights and had been elected by the people, the argument runs, it was necessary to create a strong Court to guard these rights in the future. This contribution proceeds in two steps. First, it sets out to show that this "Nazi thesis" provides an inadequate explanation for the Court's authority and rise. The German framers did not envisage a strong, rights-protecting, counter-majoritarian court. Even where the Nazi thesis does find some application during the transitional 1950s and 1960s, its role is more complicated and limited than its proponents assume. In the second part, this paper offers an alternative way of making sense of the German Court's rise to power. Against a comparative background, I argue that the German Court's success is best understood as a combination between a (weak) version of transformative constitutionalism and a hierarchical legal culture with a strong emphasis on a scientific conception of law and expertise. The Court could tap into the resources of legitimacy available in this culture by formalizing its early transformative decisions, producing its own particular style, 'Value Formalism'. Value Formalism, however, comes with costs, most notably an interpretive monopoly of lawyers shutting out other voices from constitutional interpretation.

Three Paths to Constitutionalism – and the Crisis of the European Union

“…11 For a powerful critique, see Jaggi (2012). 12 Collings 2016;Hailbronner 2014. But for now, let's stand back and return to the larger implications of my claim that there are three, not one, distinct paths to 'constitutionalism'. To drive this point home, consider how my trinitarian view adds up to a special trilemma for the European Union (EU) at its present moment of vulnerability.…”

Historický vývoj ústavního soudnictví a přístupu jednotlivce k ústavnímu soudu

“…Domnívám se ovšem, že existuje ještě jeden významnější faktor, s nímž citovaní autoři pravděpodobně implicitně počítají. Jeho 32 Podobně prakticky všechny státy východní Evropy reagovaly na pád komunistického režimu zřízením ústavního soudu. 33 Druhá skupina teorií nachází souvislost mezi ústavním soudnictvím a vnitřním uspořádáním státu.…”

Konstitucionalizacija patriotizma

“…52 Najrječitiju potvrdu te tvrdnje predstavlja "proces juridifikacije" u kojemu posebno mjesto, ulogu i značaj imaju Vrhovni sud SAD-a, 53 Savezni ustavni sud SR Njemačke, Europski sud za ljudska prava u Strasbourgu, te Europski sud pravde u Luksemburgu. 54 4.1. Ustav SAD-a (1787.)…”