2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1739958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Decision Usefulness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of what capital markets research does exist, Gassen (2008) applies an innovative and carefully crafted research design to a large sample of US firms for the period 1990-2005 and concludes that, ''valuation usefulness and stewardship are alternative objectives of financial accounting'' (Gassen, 2008, p. 39); Wu and Zhang (2009) demonstrate that the stewardship demand for information has a significant influence on firms' accounting choices; and archival work by Bushman, Engel, and Smith (2006) also suggests that stewardship relevance is not subsumed by valuation relevance. 11 Ultimately, as the fundamental conceptual problems concerning decision-usefulness are beginning to garner increased attention (Ravenscroft & Williams, 2011; Table 1-vi), it would appear that there is an urgent need for additional work-from a variety of research perspectives-focusing on the nature of the overlap and interaction between the two objectives.…”
Section: Stewardship/accountability Social Accounting and Conceptuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of what capital markets research does exist, Gassen (2008) applies an innovative and carefully crafted research design to a large sample of US firms for the period 1990-2005 and concludes that, ''valuation usefulness and stewardship are alternative objectives of financial accounting'' (Gassen, 2008, p. 39); Wu and Zhang (2009) demonstrate that the stewardship demand for information has a significant influence on firms' accounting choices; and archival work by Bushman, Engel, and Smith (2006) also suggests that stewardship relevance is not subsumed by valuation relevance. 11 Ultimately, as the fundamental conceptual problems concerning decision-usefulness are beginning to garner increased attention (Ravenscroft & Williams, 2011; Table 1-vi), it would appear that there is an urgent need for additional work-from a variety of research perspectives-focusing on the nature of the overlap and interaction between the two objectives.…”
Section: Stewardship/accountability Social Accounting and Conceptuamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this model highlights well-structured procedures by which decision-makers can make the best decision from their subjective probability. However, shortcomings in conventional economic understanding and human decision-making limit the definition of decision usefulness theory in a manner allowing its application in macro or micro level policy making decisions (Ravenscroft, 2011).…”
Section: Decision Usefulness Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%