2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourses surrounding the evolution of the IASB/FASB Conceptual Framework: What they reveal about the “living law” of accounting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(89 reference statements)
2
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the prevalence of neo-liberal paradigms at the heart of contemporary financial reporting, accountability and stewardship remain relevant considerations for users of financial statements, including current investors and creditors (Whittington, 2008;Murphy, O'Connell & Ó hÓgartaigh, 2013;Zhang & Andrew, 2013). In theory, high-quality financial reporting provides information which is useful to the users of financial statements in making assessments about the amount, timing and certainty of the reporting entity's future cash flows (IASB, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the prevalence of neo-liberal paradigms at the heart of contemporary financial reporting, accountability and stewardship remain relevant considerations for users of financial statements, including current investors and creditors (Whittington, 2008;Murphy, O'Connell & Ó hÓgartaigh, 2013;Zhang & Andrew, 2013). In theory, high-quality financial reporting provides information which is useful to the users of financial statements in making assessments about the amount, timing and certainty of the reporting entity's future cash flows (IASB, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there was broad support for the conceptual framework project and the project objectives, there were still respondents who commented particularly on how the board articulated the objective of financial reporting. Concern regarding the failure to explicitly recognize stewardship as an objective again surfaced, even though some aspects of the discussion paper comments were incorporated in the exposure draft (Murphy et al, 2013). Although stewardship was mentioned in the exposure draft, it was "subsumed by the financial reporting goal of providing decision-useful information" (O'Connell, 2007, p. 216) and therefore the "needs of stewardship are assumed to be met within the decisionusefulness objective" (Whittington, 2008b, p. 498-499).…”
Section: Issues Of Concernmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed demotion of stewardship attracted deep resilient feedback from all those who had an interest in the CF, such as accounting academics and practitioners (Murphy et al, 2013). When the IASB/FASB issued the 2006 discussion paper, many of the responses focused on the stewardship question.…”
Section: Issues Of Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy et al (2013) focus on the importance of the social role of accounting in spite of the formal pronouncements of standard setters. The manager has been and continues to be integrated into the living law of accounting despite official pronouncements of standardization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%