2014
DOI: 10.1037/a0036326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking butterflies: The affective, physiological, and performance effects of reappraising arousal during social evaluation.

Abstract: This study examined the effects of reappraising stress arousal on affective displays, physiological responses, and social performance during an evaluative situation. Participants were sampled from across the social anxiety spectrum and instructed to reappraise arousal as beneficial or received no instructions. Independent raters coded affective displays, nonverbal signaling, and speech performance. Saliva samples collected at baseline and after evaluation were assayed for salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), a protei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
100
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A power analysis based on an average effect size ( d =.66) from similar social-situational intervention research in laboratory settings using standardized social stress induction paradigms led to a targeted sample of 30 participants per condition (Beltzer, Nock, Peters, & Jamieson, 2014; Jamieson et al, 2010; Jamieson, Nock, & Mendes, 2012; Jamieson, Nock, et al, 2013; John-Henderson, Rheinschmidt, & Mendoza-Denton, 2015). A total of N =60 high school students were recruited from the Rochester, NY area using posted flyers and study information distributed by peers/teachers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A power analysis based on an average effect size ( d =.66) from similar social-situational intervention research in laboratory settings using standardized social stress induction paradigms led to a targeted sample of 30 participants per condition (Beltzer, Nock, Peters, & Jamieson, 2014; Jamieson et al, 2010; Jamieson, Nock, & Mendes, 2012; Jamieson, Nock, et al, 2013; John-Henderson, Rheinschmidt, & Mendoza-Denton, 2015). A total of N =60 high school students were recruited from the Rochester, NY area using posted flyers and study information distributed by peers/teachers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is common practice with research using this scale (see Beltzer et al, 2014), composites of situational demands (e.g., “this situation is demanding”) and personal resources (e.g., “I have the abilities to perform well”) were computed at each time point ( αs > .80; see SOM-R for additional details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there are studies showing that appraisals of the experience of stress can influence performance. Emotion regulation research highlights that reappraising the experience of stress, by reinterpreting the situation one is facing, can promote adaptive responses to high arousal states [24, 25]. For example, participants instructed to think about their physiological responses to anxiety as beneficial to performance during a Graduate Records Examination (GRE) test exhibited elevated SNS responses and performed better on the GRE relative to control participants [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, participants instructed to think about their physiological responses to anxiety as beneficial to performance during a Graduate Records Examination (GRE) test exhibited elevated SNS responses and performed better on the GRE relative to control participants [4]. Other studies have replicated and extended this effect to show that interventions instructing participants to reappraise heightened physiological responses to stress as beneficial led to more approach-oriented behavior, more adaptive physiological responses, and improved performance, relative to instructions to reappraise arousal as harmful or control conditions with no interventions [24, 26, 27]. These findings demonstrate that physiological responses, coupled with adaptive appraisals, may be advantageous for performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%