Retailer Adherence to Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, North Carolina, 2011

Abstract

IntroductionThe Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act regulates the sales and marketing of tobacco products in the United States; poor adherence by tobacco retailers may reduce the effectiveness of the Act’s provisions. The objectives of this study were 1) to assess whether and to which provisions retailers were adherent and 2) to examine differences in adherence by county, retailer neighborhood, and retailer characteristics.MethodsWe conducted multivariate analysis of tobacco retailers’ adherence to 12 point-of-sale provisions of the Tobacco Control Act in 3 North Carolina counties. We conducted observational audits of 324 retailers during 3 months in 2011 to assess adherence. We used logistic regression to assess associations between adherence to provisions and characteristics of each county, retailer neighborhood, and retailer.ResultsWe found 15.7% of retailers did not adhere to at least 1 provision; 84.3% adhered to all provisions. The provisions most frequently violated were the ban on sales of cigarettes with modified-risk labels (eg, “light” cigarettes) (43 [13.3%] retailers nonadherent) and the ban on self-service for cigarettes and smokeless tobacco (6 [1.9%] retailers nonadherent). We found significant differences in rates of nonadherence by county and type of retailer. Pharmacies and drug stores were more than 3 times as likely as grocery stores to be nonadherent.ConclusionMost tobacco retailers have implemented regulatory changes without enforcement by the US Food and Drug Administration. Monitoring rates of adherence by store type and locale (eg, county) may help retailers comply with point-of-sale provisions.

Equity impact of interventions and policies to reduce smoking in youth: systematic review

“…SES variables included education,28 – 35 parental education,24 36 – 41 household income,33 42 – 44 Family Affluence Scale (FAS),21 – 23 25 45 family socioeconomic classification,22 free school meal (FSM) eligibility,25 46 47 income/spending money,26 41 48 and occupation 49. Measures of area deprivation included the Index of Multiple Deprivation/area deprivation,25 50 – 54 Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage,54 household education and income level at ‘zip’ code level,55 56 percentage of population with a college education, 32 33 55 percentage of youth unemployment, percentage receiving social welfare and attending ‘low-qualifying’ schools, 35 53 percentage below 150% poverty level,32 57 and school census tract data 58…”

“…Four US studies28 31 32 56 examined the equity impact of controls on advertising, promotion and marketing of tobacco. Two studies31 32 had a neutral equity impact and two studies demonstrated a negative equity impact 28 56.…”

Is There a Relationship Between the Concentration of Same-Sex Couples and Tobacco Retailer Density?

“…Data from an earlier study 55 showed that, particularly in suburban and rural areas, retailers clustered at exits along interstate highways. Thus we created a dichotomous measure of presence of an interstate highway within a tract.…”

Tobacco Products Sold by Internet Vendors Following Restrictions on Flavors and Light Descriptors

“…Although studies have assessed brick-and-mortar retailer compliance with the FSPTCA, [2][3][4] no studies have investigated compliance among Internet cigarette vendors (ICVs). One reason could be the difficulty involved in tracking online vendors.…”