Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2000
DOI: 10.1159/000059140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from 88 Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: An Analysis of Predictive Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A predictability by preoperative hearing abilities has also been reported for prelingually deaf children [Kiefer et al, 2000]. Preoperative residual speech recognition has been reported to act as a 'trophic factor' that protects the spiral ganglion and the central auditory pathways from degeneration [Gomaa et al, 2003].…”
Section: Electrical Ear Canal Stimulation During Fmrimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A predictability by preoperative hearing abilities has also been reported for prelingually deaf children [Kiefer et al, 2000]. Preoperative residual speech recognition has been reported to act as a 'trophic factor' that protects the spiral ganglion and the central auditory pathways from degeneration [Gomaa et al, 2003].…”
Section: Electrical Ear Canal Stimulation During Fmrimentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although cochlear implantation (CI) performed to provide access to sound has become the standard of care for patients with severe to profound hearing loss [1][2][3] who do not benefit significantly from hearing aids, determining candidacy for CI in the pediatric population can be a complex and subjective process. [4][5][6][7] Although outcomes are generally positive in regard to patients' becoming aural/oral communicators, 2,3 fluency in spoken language is not always achieved. In fact, competency with expressive spoken language may not be the primary goal in some patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%