Restructuring States, Restructuring Ethnicity: Looking Across Disciplinary Boundaries at Federal Futures in India and Nepal

Abstract

India and federalizing Nepal represent distinct types of federal polity: their origins lie not in the unification of previously autonomous states, but in the devolution of power by a previously centralized state. The boundaries of their constituent sub-units are therefore open to debate, and settling their contours is central to the project of state-building. Written by a political scientist and an anthropologist, this paper presents a comparative exploration of the reciprocal relationship between state structuring and ethnicity in India and Nepal, with a focus on the effects of territorial versus non-territorial forms of recognition. It pushes against recent tendencies within South Asian Studies to see ethnic identity as called into being solely by state practices or 'governmentality' on the one hand, or as a newly commoditized form of belonging produced through neoliberal reforms on the other. Instead it argues that ethnicity must be understood as a multivalent concept that is at once embedded in specific histories of state and sub-state formation, and generative of them. Comparative in scope yet driven by qualitative data collected over years of engagement across the region, the paper charts a middle way between detailed ethnographic studies and large-scale comparative endeavours.

Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research

“…While the adaptation planning process does acknowledge poverty as compounding biophysical hazards, it nevertheless fails to account for how both benefits of new programmes and exposure to hazards are shaped by pre‐existing social‐political relationships (Yates ). For example, ethnicity is associated with particular political positions and livelihood opportunities (Shneiderman and Tillin ). These associations mean that financial and development resources are more easily accessible by some people compared with others in precisely the same location, even if they have similar human development index indicators (Nightingale ).…”

Regional winners and losers in future UK energy system transitions

“…While we consider here the case study of the UK, many of the challenges associated with long term energy planning in an era of state decentralisation and increased regionalism apply across different national contexts with diverse energy, environmental, and economic objectives. Political devolution has been called a global trend [49], and continues to be a driving force in many countries which were previously characterised by highly centralised forms of governance, such as Japan [50], Kenya [51], India, Nepal [52], Mexico, and Brazil [53]. Energy transitions themselves are a global issue, with 175 states now signatories to the Paris Agreement on GHG emissions reduction [54], and 164 countries working to achieve national renewable energy targets [55].…”

Masters of hybridity: how activists reconstructed Nepali society

“…88On these proposed federal boundaries, see, inter alia , Adhikari & Gellner (); Karki & Edrisinha (); P. Sharma, Khanal & Tharu (); and Shneiderman & Tillin ().…”