1952
DOI: 10.1086/335752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Orange and Grapefruit Trees to Maleic Hydrazide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work with oranges, grape fruit and lemons showed that the most undesirable fruit quality effect of MH was associated with rind thickness (8,10). Rind thickness measured made on fruit from the 0.4 Krenite and 0.25% EHPP treatments and untreated trees showed no significant differences on both dates measured, however the rind thickness of the lemons from all treat ments, including the control were reduced about 2 mm after storage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous work with oranges, grape fruit and lemons showed that the most undesirable fruit quality effect of MH was associated with rind thickness (8,10). Rind thickness measured made on fruit from the 0.4 Krenite and 0.25% EHPP treatments and untreated trees showed no significant differences on both dates measured, however the rind thickness of the lemons from all treat ments, including the control were reduced about 2 mm after storage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Growth inhibitors and retardants. MH-30, a highly active growth inhibitor of citrus (3,17) which increases or delays the loss of cold hardiness in the field (2,8,9,18), increased seedling cold hardiness in controlled conditions. MH-30 at 500 and 1000 ppm induced cold hardiness in grapefruit leaves and tw igs (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hand pruning is ex pensive, and with both hand and mechan ical pruning there is the expense of brush shredding (1,9). Chemical pruning has many drawbacks such as undesirable rind thickness (6,7), chemicals not available 'R eceived for publication July 3, 1980. The authors thank R. K eim , Superintendent, U niversity o f C ali fornia, South C oast Field Station, for his cooperation and for furnishing trees used in this field trial, also ac know ledgem ent to E .I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%