2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1113265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Comment on "Status and Trends of Amphibian Declines and Extinctions Worldwide"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No species in the areas is included in the IBAMA ("Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis", the Brazilian governmental agency for the environment and natural resources) list of Brazilian threatened amphibians , but it must be considered that there are two Brazilian lists containing two very different sets of threatened species: the IBAMA list with 24 species and the GAA list including 110 species (Baillie et al, 2004;Stuart et al, 2005). If its identity is confirmed, Physalaemus cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No species in the areas is included in the IBAMA ("Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis", the Brazilian governmental agency for the environment and natural resources) list of Brazilian threatened amphibians , but it must be considered that there are two Brazilian lists containing two very different sets of threatened species: the IBAMA list with 24 species and the GAA list including 110 species (Baillie et al, 2004;Stuart et al, 2005). If its identity is confirmed, Physalaemus cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…moreirae recorded at PECB will be included in GAA list as Data Deficient but it might be considered of Least Concern by the IBAMA list. Discrepancy between both lists reflects two different attitudes towards conservation status assessment, an evidentiary (IBAMA) and a precautionary point of view (GAA) (Baillie et al, 2004, Pimenta et al, 2005, Stuart et al, 2005. The GAA attitude is here preferred because this species is endemic to Atlantic rainforest, which is severely divided into small (< 7,000 km 2 ) isolated fragments, with only 3,000 km 2 of forest included in protected areas (Brooks & Balmford, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nowadays 31 of the Brazilian anuran species are listed as globally threatened (IUCN, 2012), and 16 as nationally threatened (Haddad, 2008). Even though the number of threatened species in Brazil has been a matter of debate (Pimenta et al, 2005;Stuart et al, 2004Stuart et al, , 2005Morais et al, 2012), a high proportion (25%) of species listed as Data Deficient may be found in Brazil and it indicates a high level of uncertainty about the conservation status of amphibians within the country and may affect the effectiveness of conservation actions (Trindade-Filho et al, 2012;Verdade et al, 2012). Herein, our main objective is to suggest a strategic framework to help overcome the uncertainty regarding the conservation status of species, using anurans in Brazil as a case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, revisions and adjustments in the criteria used to assess the level of extinction threat of species have significantly improved the reliability of the IUCN Red List (Mace et al ., ). However, subjectivity is still used to rank the status of many species (Akçakaya et al ., ; Clements et al ., ), especially in data‐poor regions such as Brazil (Pimenta et al ., ; Stuart et al ., ), which harbours a substantial proportion of the New World anurans (nearly 30%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%