2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of C and N cycles to N fertilization in Sphagnum and Molinia-dominated peat mesocosms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where i (µmol CO 2 µmol −1 per photon) is the initial slope of the hyperbola, GPP max is the maximum GPP (µmol m −2 s −1 ) and PPFD is the photosynthetic photon flux density (µmol m −2 s −1 ). This approach was modified by Mahadevan et al (2008) and Kandel et al (2013) to include the effect of temperature and vegetation on the GPP model. The vegetation index was implemented (Mc leaves ) in the models after studying the relationship between GPP and photosynthetic photon flux density at different vegetation stages (described in Results; Figs.…”
Section: Gross Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where i (µmol CO 2 µmol −1 per photon) is the initial slope of the hyperbola, GPP max is the maximum GPP (µmol m −2 s −1 ) and PPFD is the photosynthetic photon flux density (µmol m −2 s −1 ). This approach was modified by Mahadevan et al (2008) and Kandel et al (2013) to include the effect of temperature and vegetation on the GPP model. The vegetation index was implemented (Mc leaves ) in the models after studying the relationship between GPP and photosynthetic photon flux density at different vegetation stages (described in Results; Figs.…”
Section: Gross Primary Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many peatlands have encountered degradation through anthropogenic activities such as grazing, draining, burning, and conversion to agriculture, industries, and urban areas, which reduce carbon uptake from the atmosphere (Waddington et al, 2010). Therefore, CH4 emissions from peatlands have taken interest from many researchers all over the world recently (Leroy et al, 2017;Huang et al, 2020;Saraswati and Strack, 2019).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to IPCC estimates (Ciais et al 2013) the contribution of natural mires into total natural methane emissions ranged between 61 and 82%. The intensity of GHG fluxes is controlled by different factors including the hydrological and thermal regime of the peat deposit (Naumov 2009;Sasakawa et al 2012;Helfter et al 2015;Molchanov 2015;Walker et al 2016;Glagolev et al 2017;Veretennikova and Dyukarev 2017;Leroy et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the hydrological and ecological mechanisms controlling peatland response to climate changes is critical to predict potential feedbacks on the global C cycle (Baird et al 2012; The second assessment report… 2014). Recent field studies indicated that the peatland C balance represents a net C sink in intact peatlands in Canada (Wu et al 2010;Munir et al 2014;Webster et al 2018), China (zhu et al 2015zhou et al 2009), Finland (Laine et al 2019;Minkkinen et al 2018), Ireland (Swenson et al 2019), Scotland (Helfter et al 2015), Germany (Günther et al 2017), France (Leroy et al 2017), Poland (Acosta et al 2017), New zealand (Campbell et al 2014), East (Runkle et al 2013;Fleischer et al 2016;Eckhardt et al 2018;Davydov et al 2018) and Western part of Russia Kurganova et al 2011;Molchanov 2015;Ivanov et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%