1993
DOI: 10.1097/00004850-199300820-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responders and non-responders to bifemelane hydrochloride in Alzheimer-type and multi-infarct dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). As had been observed in rat astrocytes (6), lower concentration of bifemelane induced a slow onset increase in the [Ca 2+ ] i of human origin astrocytes, but at a concentration of 1000 µM, the drug induced a ] i during the administration, and a second increase during washing of the drug (Fig. 2: a and b).…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b). As had been observed in rat astrocytes (6), lower concentration of bifemelane induced a slow onset increase in the [Ca 2+ ] i of human origin astrocytes, but at a concentration of 1000 µM, the drug induced a ] i during the administration, and a second increase during washing of the drug (Fig. 2: a and b).…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Interestingly, the drug induced rapid onset and highly reversible blocking effects on the SOCC activated in the cells treated with thapsigargin and bathed in normal medium (5). Although the dose required to cause the effect seemed to be much higher than its therapeutic dose, the effects of bifemelane on the [Ca 2+ ] i of astrocytes found in our previous study might have some relationship to the pharmacological and therapeutic efficiency of the drug (6,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Differential responses of patient subpopulations to different treatments were described in the past for various diseases including ALS (Abe et al, 2017;Agnoli et al, 1981;Date et al, 2018;Factor et al, 1989;Fujimori et al, 2018;Morello et al, 2019;Okamoto et al, 2008;Roberts et al, 2014;Shigeta et al, 1993;Venneri et al, 2009). The difficulty is to predict such responses ahead of enrollment into a clinical trial and to determine the best treatment options for patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale drug studies in AD are usually restricted to rather short periods of this slowly progressive disorder lim iting the treatment and observation periods to 6-12 weeks, e.g., tacrine for 6 weeks [5], tacrine and lecithin for 6 weeks [50] , tacrine for 12 weeks [6], physostigmine for 6 weeks [51] , oxiracetam for 4-12 weeks [52], Trials designed for longer observation periods are mostly restricted to smaller patients populations (levocamitine 3 plus 3 months [7], piracetam 1 year [11]) and the effects of treatment were evident only in subtests (levocamitine [7]), indicated as a trend to slow the progression of the disease (piracetam [11], indomethacin [53]) or demonstrable only in a rather small number of responders (bifemelane [54], tacrine [50]). The influence of memory training or cognitive rehabilita tion programs were usually followed for longer periods, but gains have been generally small or nonexistent [ 13] and the effects seen in only a few studies were restricted to persis tence of performance in everyday cognitive and memory tasks and daily life activities compared to a decline in these tasks in the untreated control groups [55][56][57], Since previous investigations of our group have indi cated an effect of several drugs on brain glucose metabo lism and cognitive performance when given for 2-6 weeks [58][59][60], a parallel 4-group trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of several therapeutic strategies over 6 months, which is to be considered a meaningful period for a chronic progressive disorder like AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%