2008
DOI: 10.1097/ss.0b013e31817b6687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residue Management and Water Delivery Effects on Season-Long Surface Soil Water Dynamics in Soybean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ash measurements were assayed in triplicate for each plot in 2009. Similar to Verkler et al (2008), volumetric soil water content profiles were measured throughout the experimental period from May 2009 to February 2011 using CS616 water content reflectometers (WCR [Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT]). Each sensor consisted of two stainless steel rods 0.3-m long and 3.2 mm in diameter with 0.03-m spacing between the two rods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ash measurements were assayed in triplicate for each plot in 2009. Similar to Verkler et al (2008), volumetric soil water content profiles were measured throughout the experimental period from May 2009 to February 2011 using CS616 water content reflectometers (WCR [Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT]). Each sensor consisted of two stainless steel rods 0.3-m long and 3.2 mm in diameter with 0.03-m spacing between the two rods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have addressed the greater soil water storage and lower runoff in NT for different crops (Blevins et al, 1990;De Vita et al, 2007;Almaraz et al, 2009;Stipesevic and Kladivko 2005;Verkler et al, 2008). Tormena et al (2002) and Klein and Libardi (2002) identified properties that increase water storage under NT when compared with CT for different soils and crops.…”
Section: Soil Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tormena et al (2002) and Klein and Libardi (2002) identified properties that increase water storage under NT when compared with CT for different soils and crops. Verkler et al (2008) conducted experiments on soybean crop using both NT and CT systems, recording soil water content values over a two year period (2005 and 2006) to a depth of 0.075m in the delta of the Mississippi River, in the United States. Despite little difference in soil water storage between the two tillage systems in this layer, the soil dries slower under NT and continues with higher water content, allowing for water to be available for longer periods of time.…”
Section: Soil Water Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CI under NT was greater than under CT at either residue level at the 0.4-m depth. Because tillage was not expected to have had any direct effect at this depth, differences in CI between burn treatments might be caused by deeper rooting and greater root decomposition rates and moisture contents under burning than nonburning (Verkler et al, 2008).…”
Section: Treatment Effects On CImentioning
confidence: 97%