2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-020-09649-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research front and evolution of technology education in Taiwan and abroad: bibliometric co-citation analysis and maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, researchers will set appropriate time periods according to their research purposes when conducting research, and choose the appropriate time period for their research time range, which fully reflects the influence of the knowledge of the research topic. For example, Åström (2007), Cornelius, Landström and Persson (2006), Fang and Lee (2021) all use 5 years as a period for analysis; Aguillo (1996), Cornelius et al (2006), Fang and Lee (2014), van Leeuwen and Moed (2002) suggested that the time period should be adjusted to 4-5 years according to the nature of different professional fields, and the time period should be adjusted appropriately to fully reflect the development context and trends of the research theme.…”
Section: Research Objectives and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, researchers will set appropriate time periods according to their research purposes when conducting research, and choose the appropriate time period for their research time range, which fully reflects the influence of the knowledge of the research topic. For example, Åström (2007), Cornelius, Landström and Persson (2006), Fang and Lee (2021) all use 5 years as a period for analysis; Aguillo (1996), Cornelius et al (2006), Fang and Lee (2014), van Leeuwen and Moed (2002) suggested that the time period should be adjusted to 4-5 years according to the nature of different professional fields, and the time period should be adjusted appropriately to fully reflect the development context and trends of the research theme.…”
Section: Research Objectives and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, co-word analysis has been widely used in various disciplines. (such as: Callon et al, 1991;Fang & Lee, 2021;Kostoff & Scaller, 2001;Li, Chen, Feng, Chen, & Hou, 2020;Nguyen, 2019;Niu et al, 2014;Xu & Ma, 2021;Zhu & Zhang, 2020) and other fields. It can be seen that most of the literature starts from the perspective of the structure of research disciplines, analyzes the development context, research status, and predicts future development trends.…”
Section: Co-word Analysis Can Effectively Understand Research Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, while the necessity for enhancing the social prestige of vocational education is recognized, detailed examinations of the factors influencing public perceptions and strategies to augment the appeal of vocational careers are limited [19][20] .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the Nordlof et al [77] study with the title -Towards a three-part heuristic framework for technology education‖. Fourthly, the study by Fang and Lee [82] with the title -research front and evolution of technology education in Taiwan and abroad: bibliometric co-citation analysis and maps‖. These studies show that technology education has a vital role in enhancing the technological literacy of students or teachers.…”
Section: The Most Emerging Abstract Regarding Technological Literacy ...mentioning
confidence: 99%