2017
DOI: 10.4238/gmr16039736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Article Genotypic gain with simultaneous selection of production, nutrition, and culinary traits in cowpea crosses and backcrosses using mixed models.

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The aim of this study was to estimate the genotypic gain with simultaneous selection of production, nutrition, and culinary traits in cowpea crosses and backcrosses and to compare different selection indexes. Eleven cowpea populations were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Fourteen traits were evaluated, and the following parameters were estimated: genotypic variation coefficient, genotypic determination coefficient, experimental quality indicator and selection r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for oleic acid, the variance due to environment and genotype were similar (40% and 35%, respectively). Similar constraints have been reported for studies in soybean [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] and cowpea [ 60 , 61 , 62 ]. To date, there have been few, if any, detailed genetic studies to determine genetic, non-genetic, or GxE interactions for any trait in bambara groundnut.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for oleic acid, the variance due to environment and genotype were similar (40% and 35%, respectively). Similar constraints have been reported for studies in soybean [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] and cowpea [ 60 , 61 , 62 ]. To date, there have been few, if any, detailed genetic studies to determine genetic, non-genetic, or GxE interactions for any trait in bambara groundnut.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), SIs have been used to identify superior genotypes for yield, grain size, disease resistance, and cooking time [ 78 , 79 ] and to predict increases in genetic gain for selected traits in multigenerational families [ 80 ]. Within the Vigna genus, SIs have been applied to cowpea breeding in Brazil [ 62 ], to identify superior genotypes that fulfilled a set of agronomic (days to flowering, days to maturity, pod length, pod number, 100 seed weight, and grain yield), nutritional (protein, iron, and zinc), and culinary traits (cooking time). Five SIs were developed, and fifteen scenarios were tested with varied combinations of traits and trait weighting ( Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation analyses showed that cultivars with earlier maturation tend to present lower plant heights, since the correlation of NDF was positive to NDM, and negative to PH (Table 3). Oliveira et al (2017), evaluated the genotypic gain in simultaneous selection for cowpea production and other characters and found high and positive correlation estimates between number of days for beginning of flowering and number of days for maturation. Andrade et al (2010), reported that the selection of cowpea genotypes for green bean production is easier when it is possible to indirectly select genotypes through characters measured ** = significant at p<0.01, * = significant at p<0.05, and the other pares were not significant by the F test earlier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection strategies based on these indexes are advantageous because they have lower costs and are faster than other methods. Moreover, it is a good strategy to be used by cowpea breeding programs with limited human and financial resources (OLIVEIRA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of individual traits in the final product largely depends on how each trait has been weighted and selected in the reference population. Several studies suggest that selection based on multi trait index is more convenient in predicting the best genotypes than relying on direct selection (Oliveira et al, 2017;Rodrigues et al, 2017). This was observed in some populations, when visual selection was used for traits such as average yield, they ranked almost the last but when multiple trait selection was used they ranked among the top most populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%