“…English language, as before, is to act as the ‘panacea’ (Greenwood and Robins, , p. 507; Sasse, , p. 678) to the ills caused by a lack of integration (Khan, ) and serve as an antidote to radicalization. These Muslim migrant women are the vehicle for this panacea of English language because they are biological and social ‘reproducers’ of the nation (Yuval‐Davis and Anthias, ; Yuval‐Davis and Anthias, ), who will, it is argued, raise young people with the correct values (Lonergan, ; Yuval‐Davis et al ., ; see also Morrice, ). It is vital, according to Casey, for this existing culture of failed care to be transformed by using the English language as the vehicle to impose the correct British values – and in turn, the correct forms of care and control – on Muslim groups.…”