2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reported credibility techniques in higher education evaluation studies that use qualitative methods: A research synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first subquestion asked: What themes of anti‐racism and anti‐colonialism arose from the co‐creation process of the SEL program? To address this subquestion, we analyzed the triangulated data (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Liao & Hitchcock, 2018) collected from the past 3 years of the study (see Table 1). Artifacts that were used in the data analysis included (a) correspondence between university researchers and the community liaison, CAB members, and stakeholders; (b) audio recordings, videos, and transcripts of eight CAB meetings; and (c) recordings, videos, and transcripts of 15 SEL program (curriculum) co‐creation meetings, and (d) researcher memos.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first subquestion asked: What themes of anti‐racism and anti‐colonialism arose from the co‐creation process of the SEL program? To address this subquestion, we analyzed the triangulated data (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Liao & Hitchcock, 2018) collected from the past 3 years of the study (see Table 1). Artifacts that were used in the data analysis included (a) correspondence between university researchers and the community liaison, CAB members, and stakeholders; (b) audio recordings, videos, and transcripts of eight CAB meetings; and (c) recordings, videos, and transcripts of 15 SEL program (curriculum) co‐creation meetings, and (d) researcher memos.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ethnographic studies, the collection of observations, interviews and/or focus group work and organized documentary work are considered essential. These methods are particularly interesting and demonstrate their credibility [ 89 ], not only with small samples that can generate deviations in quantitative approaches, but also when, due to the typology of the users, it is necessary to obtain more personal information [ 90 ].…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the evaluation process result is not good, Student will follow various coaching and guidance determined based on student cases and discussions between departments and student advisory units. On the other hand, if students get poor grades and less motivation, then the department and student advisory unit will try to provide solutions according to student interests [12].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Study Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%