Abstract:A simple and novel combination of ultra-precision diamond ball-end milling and micro injection molding technique is described to produce precise microlens arrays out of polycarbonate (PC), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) as well as polystyrene (PS). The microlens arrays consist of 100 lenses in a 10 9 10 array with a lens radius of 273 lm, a lens diameter of 300 lm and a lens depth of 45 lm. Pitch between the lenses is fixed at 800 lm. The injection molding parameters were optimized to get precise microlens geom… Show more
“…Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a polymer with good mechanical strength and optical properties and is suitable for manufacturing microfluidic devices by injection moulding (Ma et al 2020). The effect of moulding conditions on the replication of microfeatures on PMMA, including mould temperature, injection velocity (speed), injection pressure/time and packing pressure, have been investigated (Liou and Chen 2006;Chien 2006;Kirchberg et al 2012). Guided by numerical simulation, there also have been attempts to fabricate nanopillars with PMMA by injection moulding (Jiang et al 2016;Zhou et al 2018b).…”
Injection moulding of micropillar arrays offers a fast and inexpensive method for manufacturing sensors, optics, lab-on-a-chip devices, and medical devices. Material choice is important for both the function of the device and manufacturing optimisation. Here, a comparative study of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) injection moulding of micropillar arrays is presented. These two polymers are chosen for their convenient physical, chemical, and optical properties, which are favoured for microfluidic devices. COC is shown to replicate the mould’s nano/microstructures more precisely than PMMA. COC successfully forms a micropillar array (250 mm diameter; 496 mm high) and closely replicates surfaces with nano-scale roughness (30–120 nm). In the same moulds, PMMA forms lens arrays (not true pillars) and smoother surfaces due to the incomplete filling for all parameters studied. Thus, COC offers finer structural detail for devices that require micro and nano-structured features, and may be more suited to injection moulding microfluidic devices.
“…Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a polymer with good mechanical strength and optical properties and is suitable for manufacturing microfluidic devices by injection moulding (Ma et al 2020). The effect of moulding conditions on the replication of microfeatures on PMMA, including mould temperature, injection velocity (speed), injection pressure/time and packing pressure, have been investigated (Liou and Chen 2006;Chien 2006;Kirchberg et al 2012). Guided by numerical simulation, there also have been attempts to fabricate nanopillars with PMMA by injection moulding (Jiang et al 2016;Zhou et al 2018b).…”
Injection moulding of micropillar arrays offers a fast and inexpensive method for manufacturing sensors, optics, lab-on-a-chip devices, and medical devices. Material choice is important for both the function of the device and manufacturing optimisation. Here, a comparative study of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) injection moulding of micropillar arrays is presented. These two polymers are chosen for their convenient physical, chemical, and optical properties, which are favoured for microfluidic devices. COC is shown to replicate the mould’s nano/microstructures more precisely than PMMA. COC successfully forms a micropillar array (250 mm diameter; 496 mm high) and closely replicates surfaces with nano-scale roughness (30–120 nm). In the same moulds, PMMA forms lens arrays (not true pillars) and smoother surfaces due to the incomplete filling for all parameters studied. Thus, COC offers finer structural detail for devices that require micro and nano-structured features, and may be more suited to injection moulding microfluidic devices.
“…Besides, there are some problems including complicated processing steps, high cost, and low processing efficiency. Chen et al [14] and Kirchberg et al [15] used ultra-precision milling to process silicon-based molds combined with injection molding to process high-quality microlenses, but the processing cycle is too long. Chang et al [16] realized non-contact rapid rolling on the glass substrate based on the rolling technology and produced a microlens array with high surface quality; however, it is difficult to control each microlens' dimension accuracy.…”
Hot embossing has been widely used in fabricating microlens arrays because of its low cost, high efficiency, and high quality. The process parameters such as molding temperature, molding pressure, and holding temperature affect the microlens array’s replication quality. This work selected the stainless steel S136H tool steel as the mold material to process an aspheric microlens array structure through ultra-precision milling. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) microlens arrays with different surface replication were prepared by controlling the molding temperature, molding pressure, and holding temperature. By analyzing the surface quality, contour replication, and optical imaging of hot-embossed samples, the optimal molding temperature of PMMA for optimal replication of aspheric lens arrays was determined as 130 °C. Besides, the internal elastic recovery of PMMA affected the dimensional accuracy and optical performance of the lens. The results showed that, at the molding pressure of 400 N and the holding temperature of 60 °C, the surface defects were eliminated, and the aspheric lens array had perfect replication with a profile deviation of only 4 μm. The aspheric microlens array with good quality was eventually achieved by these optimal process parameters, which provides a foundation for producing aspheric microlens arrays in a low-cost and high-efficiency way.
“…Hence, the development of a low‐cost, high‐efficiency method for the fabrication of various lens array molds is essential. Many precision manufacturing technologies for preparing lens array molds with different dimensions have been proposed and attempted, such as focused ion beam technology , three‐dimensional diffuser lithography , isotropic etching of glass masters , a combined thermal reflow and electroforming process , and ultra‐precision diamond milling . In addition, we have developed a technique combining photolithography and wet chemical etching for the fabrication of a thin stainless steel mold with a circular hole array pattern.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.