2004
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200410000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability and Effects of Sequential Measurements with POBF Tonograph

Abstract: If IOP measurements have to be repeated using the POBF Tonograph, they are best done after an interval of at least 2 minutes and preferably after 15 minutes. Use of the POBF Tonograph had no significant immediate effect on the IOP or POBF values obtained from a fellow eye.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 Clinical studies to quantify the effects of corneal stiffness (which varies with corneal thickness, curvature, age, and medical history) started >50 years ago, and concentrated on the thickness for being the most prominent stiffness parameter. 39 Using both clinical data and mathematical modeling, the studies estimated errors in GAT-IOP within the wide range of 0.7 to 7.1 mm Hg for a change in CCT of 100 mm. 3,7-11 Similar work has shown a similar effect of CCT on IOP readings by ORA and CVS, with IOP being underestimated in thin corneas and overestimated in thick corneas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Clinical studies to quantify the effects of corneal stiffness (which varies with corneal thickness, curvature, age, and medical history) started >50 years ago, and concentrated on the thickness for being the most prominent stiffness parameter. 39 Using both clinical data and mathematical modeling, the studies estimated errors in GAT-IOP within the wide range of 0.7 to 7.1 mm Hg for a change in CCT of 100 mm. 3,7-11 Similar work has shown a similar effect of CCT on IOP readings by ORA and CVS, with IOP being underestimated in thin corneas and overestimated in thick corneas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14] Despite wide interindividual variation, the technique is characterised by excellent reproducibility. [15][16][17] In healthy adults, mild systemic hypoxia did not alter POBF, suggesting that global pulsatile choroidal blood flow was not vulnerable to mild transient hypoxia. 18 It has been reported that POBF readings are not altered by the Valsalva manoeuvre (unlike IOP) in healthy subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This finding is also unsurprising because a reduction in IOP recorded during sequential tonometry has been recorded during POBF measurements 25 and Goldmann applanation tonometry. 26 During microkeratome application, IOP increased to a mean 88.9 G 2.3 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%