2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40792-020-00936-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of gastro-tracheobronchial fistula after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using intercostal muscle and latissimus dorsi muscle flaps: a case report

Abstract: Background: Gastro-tracheobronchial fistula after esophagectomy is a rare but life-threatening complication associated with high mortality. Several authors reported postoperative management of tracheobronchial fistula. However, treatment is demanding and challenging, and the strategy is still controversial. Case presentation: A 64-year-old man underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymph node dissection and gastric conduit reconstruction by an intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer at a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, surgical management plays an important role in the treatment of type II PEAF patients, which can effectively restore normal nutrition and reduce airway aspiration with a very low risk of recurrence. Surgical management is relatively successful, and includes esophageal exclusion and fistula repaired with a strap muscle (8), intercostal muscle (5,17), latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (18,19), pedicled pericardial flap (15), pectoralis major muscle flap (20), and omental and pleural patch (5), as well as reconstruction by the interposition of colon (5) and jejunum (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, surgical management plays an important role in the treatment of type II PEAF patients, which can effectively restore normal nutrition and reduce airway aspiration with a very low risk of recurrence. Surgical management is relatively successful, and includes esophageal exclusion and fistula repaired with a strap muscle (8), intercostal muscle (5,17), latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (18,19), pedicled pericardial flap (15), pectoralis major muscle flap (20), and omental and pleural patch (5), as well as reconstruction by the interposition of colon (5) and jejunum (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As patients often present with malnutrition and repeated pneumonia, prompt administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, gastric drainage, maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance, and chest physiotherapy are necessary before definitive surgery. Even though there is no standard treatment for GBF, several interventions have been proposed in the past 20 years, such as esophageal stenting, tracheobronchial Y-shaped stenting, over-the-scope clips, fistula plugs, and surgical repair with muscle flaps or bovine pericardium [2,6,9,12–14] . Interestingly, Li et al have demonstrated that surgical repair has a greater long-term survival rate than other non-invasive treatments [10] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there is no standard treatment for GBF, several interventions have been proposed in the past 20 years, such as esophageal stenting, tracheobronchial Y-shaped stenting, over-the-scope clips, fistula plugs, and surgical repair with muscle flaps or bovine pericardium. [2,6,9,[12][13][14] Interestingly, Li et al have demonstrated that surgical repair has a greater long-term survival rate than other non-invasive treatments. [10]…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been reports on using latissimus dorsi muscle and pericardial flap instead of intercostal muscle flap [ 9 , 10 ]; as the surgeon believed a tight closure is required for the fistula, the intercostal muscles was used instead of latissimus dorsi which is believed to be better for wide areas but not good to cover a fistula tightly [ 9 ]. Furthermore, although primary repair with pericardial flaps was reported, they are unsafe as they are poorly vascularised and can paradoxically move, mainly with positive pressure ventilation [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%