2007
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of critical size defects in the rat cranium using ceramic‐reinforced PLA scaffolds obtained by supercritical gas foaming

Abstract: Bioresorbable scaffolds made of poly(L-lactic acid) (PLA) obtained by supercritical gas foaming were recently described as suitable for tissue engineering, portraying biocompatibility with primary osteoblasts in vitro and interesting mechanical properties when reinforced with ceramics. The behavior of such constructs remained to be evaluated in vivo and therefore the present study was undertaken to compare different PLA/ceramic composite scaffolds obtained by supercritical gas foaming in a critical size defect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of combining ceramic and polymer is to control resorption rates [36]. In a pilot study in cranial defects in rats, the same PLA/ceramic scaffolds as used in this study did not show signs of alteration during the first 3 months after implantation (unpublished results), whereas fragmentation was observed after 18 weeks [6]. In the present work, and confirming these observations, changes in scaffold morphology were not noticed before 6 months post-surgery in the cranial model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One advantage of combining ceramic and polymer is to control resorption rates [36]. In a pilot study in cranial defects in rats, the same PLA/ceramic scaffolds as used in this study did not show signs of alteration during the first 3 months after implantation (unpublished results), whereas fragmentation was observed after 18 weeks [6]. In the present work, and confirming these observations, changes in scaffold morphology were not noticed before 6 months post-surgery in the cranial model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, in the case of the PLA/TCP biocomposite, fetal bone cell development did not seem to be affected by differences in porosity and pore size in vitro [2]. In a preliminary in vivo study concerning PLA/TCP obtained by supercritical gas foaming, only one type of porous structure, porosity and pore size was tested and bone repair was assessed [6]. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the osteogenicity of fetal bone cells in vivo when associated to PLA/TCP scaffolds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…246,247 Both PGA and PLA scaffolds has been investigated as a slowdelivery carrier for growth factors in several in vitro and in vivo studies, and demonstrated the ability to promote healing and osseointegration compared with control scaffolds. [248][249][250] However, due to the low modulus of PLA, it must be either copolymerized with a higher modulus polymer, or made into a composite with a different material. PGA, the simplest linear aliphatic polyester is highly crystalline (45-55%), has a high melting point (220 C), and a glass transition temperature of $35 C. PGA alone has a high modulus (7 GPa), and completely degrades in vivo within 4-6 months.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Polymer Biodegradationmentioning
confidence: 99%