2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of alveolar cleft defect with mesenchymal stem cells and platelet derived growth factors: A preliminary report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
108
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
108
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results matched with Behania et al [18] study although short time evaluation of this study. In the opposite side, Khojasteh et al [17] concluded that mesenchymal stem cells enhance bone regeneration in critical size defects more than platelet derived growth factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results matched with Behania et al [18] study although short time evaluation of this study. In the opposite side, Khojasteh et al [17] concluded that mesenchymal stem cells enhance bone regeneration in critical size defects more than platelet derived growth factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The palatal mucoperiosteal flaps were reflected and sutured to each other to repair the palatal mucosa of palatal side of the cleft if needed. During preparation of the recipient site, in group I the required amount of blood was aspirated and centrifuged for PRF preparation according to Choukroun's method [17][18][19] and beside that the required amount of bone marrow was aspirated from the ilium. PRF gel (4-6 ml) and bone marrow aspirate (1-2 ml) were mixed with a mount of β-Tricalcium phosphate granules, according to size of defect and placed in recipient bed.…”
Section: Operative Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moy, Lundgren, and Holmes (1993) found that bone graft substitute materials implanted alone instead of autologous bone graft resulted in a lower success rate compared with the combination of cells and bone graft substitute. This suggests that tissue engineering strategies using cells combined with a supportive biomaterial scaffold may be a more effective treatment for cleft palate repair than biomaterials alone (Behnia, Khojasteh, Soleimani, Tehranchi, & Atashi, 2012; Khojasteh, Eslaminejad, & Nazarian, 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of these cells has evoked great enthusiasm and high expectations in both scientific and commercial circles. However, in general clinical applications of stem cells in reconstructive surgery have been limited to small case series with varying results and/or short follow‐up periods 14, 31, 32, 33. Among the published studies, there is a great variability in, for example, stem cell sources, defect sites and sizes, indications, cell carriers, and use of growth factors that makes it difficult to draw a solid conclusion on stem cell effectiveness in bone tissue engineering 26.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%