Diseases of Poultry 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781119421481.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reovirus Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ARVs are ubiquitous in domestic poultry with 80% of them being non-pathogenic and are frequently found in clinically healthy birds (Jones, 2008). However, ARVs have also been known to cause different disease conditions in poultry including enteritis, hepatitis, neurological disorder, myocarditis, respiratory distress and viral arthritis/tenosynovitis (Jones, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ARVs are ubiquitous in domestic poultry with 80% of them being non-pathogenic and are frequently found in clinically healthy birds (Jones, 2008). However, ARVs have also been known to cause different disease conditions in poultry including enteritis, hepatitis, neurological disorder, myocarditis, respiratory distress and viral arthritis/tenosynovitis (Jones, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ubiquity of this virus in the chicken normal intestinal flora and in the commercial avian housing makes a solid causal relationship difficult to establish between the presence of this virus and a disease as malabsorption syndrome. This is however not the case in VAT, in which many reovirus serotypes were identified as causal agents, such as the S1133 strain which is commonly included in modified-live and inactivated vaccines used to protect against this disease (5). Chickens are most susceptible to reovirus infection at one day of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further investigation revealed that a S1133 reovirus vaccine labelled for drinking water administration in 10 to 17 week-old chickens was inadvertently subcutaneously administered to the day-old chicks. Since chickens are most sensitive to the pathogenic action of the ARV at a day of age, we postulate that a live vaccinal strain, even attenuated, could have the potential to induce such dramatic lesions in susceptible birds (5). It is interesting to note that, in one study, chicken orally inoculated with a reovirus strain rarely died (3% mortality) compared to those who were inoculated intramuscularly (54% mortality) (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations