2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogenetic analysis, genomic diversity and classification of M class gene segments of turkey reoviruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For species B rotavirus VP7, NSP2, and NSP5 segments, genotype percent nucleotide identity cutoffs of 80%, 75%, and 78%, respectively, have been proposed ( Marthaler et al, 2012 ; Suzuki et al, 2012a ; Suzuki et al, 2012b ). Likewise, genotype cutoffs of 83–90% have been proposed for M- and L-class segments of turkey arthritis reoviruses ( Mor et al, 2015 ; Mor et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For species B rotavirus VP7, NSP2, and NSP5 segments, genotype percent nucleotide identity cutoffs of 80%, 75%, and 78%, respectively, have been proposed ( Marthaler et al, 2012 ; Suzuki et al, 2012a ; Suzuki et al, 2012b ). Likewise, genotype cutoffs of 83–90% have been proposed for M- and L-class segments of turkey arthritis reoviruses ( Mor et al, 2015 ; Mor et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final genotype assignments were made based on the following criteria: (i) bootstrap values at nodes defining genotypes had values equal to or greater than 85%, and (ii) we observed minimal overlap in intergenotype and intragenotype identity. Similar strategies have been used to define genotype cutoffs for classification of rotavirus and avian reovirus ( Jeong et al, 2015 ; Marthaler et al, 2013 ; Marthaler et al, 2014 ; Matthijnssens et al, 2008a ; Mor et al, 2015 ; Mor et al, 2014 ; Shepherd et al, 2018 ). In some cases, these strict definitions were insufficient to distinguish reovirus serotypes, genotypes, and clades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence analysis of a portion of the S1 gene segment has been commonly used for the characterization and classification of ARV isolates, but other genome segments were also targeted with similar objectives ( 24 , 25 ). Historically, partial S1 gene characterization methods have classified ARV strains into five genotypic clusters, but more recent works attempted to introduce additional genetic clusters ( 8 , 10 , 12 , 26 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARV pathogenicity is very variable from high to low virulence ( 41 ). ARV isolates in domestic poultry with 80% of them being non-pathogenic and are frequently found in clinical healthy birds ( 17 , 42 , 43 ). ARV infection is associated with transitional ARV diseases, including arthritis/tenosynovitis, MAS, RSS, respiratory diseases, hepatitis, myocarditis, and immunosuppression ( 44 , 45 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%