2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of thorium from water using modified magnetite nanoparticles capped with rosin amidoxime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the E% values of the cryogel composite are more than that of the cryogel when the MB concentration reaches more than 4.69 mmol L −1 . These data indicate that the porous structure of Na‐AMPS/SS‐Na increases the interaction between negative charges of sulfonate groups of cryogel and positive charges of MB cationic dye …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, the E% values of the cryogel composite are more than that of the cryogel when the MB concentration reaches more than 4.69 mmol L −1 . These data indicate that the porous structure of Na‐AMPS/SS‐Na increases the interaction between negative charges of sulfonate groups of cryogel and positive charges of MB cationic dye …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] More recently, the use of adsorbents with a combination of porosity and magnetic properties has been proposed as the most effective magnetic separation technique for applying nanocomposites for water treatment and oil spill collection. [17][18][19][20][21] Hydrophobic magnetic nanomaterials have also been proposed to control water pollution from crude oil spills due to their excellent dispersion in crude oil and good response to an external magnetic eld. Different methods have been used to prepare magnetic nanomaterials based on magnetite, such as co-precipitation, microemulsion, thermal decomposition, and hydrothermal synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…networks as reported in previous work. [31][32][33] The mechanism for formation of magnetic cryogels is represented in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Adsorption and Desorption Measurements Of Cryogel Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that the better magnetite dispersion and porous ionic magnetite cryogel network morphology will increase the removal rates of cationic organic dyes from water pollutants. [31][32][33] On the other hand, Na-AMPS cryogels are selected to adsorb water pollutants due to their negative surface charge and the presence of sulfonate and amide groups that can form complexes with the pollutants.…”
Section: Cryogels and Their Magnetite Composites As Mb Dye Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%