2022
DOI: 10.2298/sos2201105p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of the As(V) and Sr(VI) from the water using magnetite/3D-printed wollastonite hybrid adsorbent

Abstract: In this study, the structure, morphology and composition of the synthesized magnetite/3D-printed wollastonite (3D_W/M) composite were characterized, and its adsorption performance with respect to As(V) and Cr(VI) were studied. Magnetite (MG) modified 3D printed wollastonite was obtained by two step procedure: modification of 3D_W with 3-aminoproylsilane (APTES) followed by controlled magnetite (MG) deposition to obtain 3D_W/M adsorbent. The structure/properties of 3D_W/M were confirmed by app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another relevant aspect is the value of the energy of activation, E A = 45.45 kJ·mol −1 . This value is relatively higher but in the order of magnitude of the energy of activation found by applying V, Ti-bearing magnetite (VTM) humic acid-modified particles and Magnetite/3D-Printed Wollastonite Hybrid, where 17.408 and 14.49 kJ·mol −1 were calculated, respectively [ 45 , 46 ]. The difference in Temkin’s heat of sorption can be caused by the sequential adsorption-reduction process involved in the CCNC application instead of pure adsorption processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant aspect is the value of the energy of activation, E A = 45.45 kJ·mol −1 . This value is relatively higher but in the order of magnitude of the energy of activation found by applying V, Ti-bearing magnetite (VTM) humic acid-modified particles and Magnetite/3D-Printed Wollastonite Hybrid, where 17.408 and 14.49 kJ·mol −1 were calculated, respectively [ 45 , 46 ]. The difference in Temkin’s heat of sorption can be caused by the sequential adsorption-reduction process involved in the CCNC application instead of pure adsorption processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%