2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of heavy metals from water sources in the developing world using low-cost materials: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
267
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 658 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
5
267
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…There are various methods for dealing with heavy metal pollution in groundwater resources. These could be pumped and treated [6], be absorbed [7] by various kinds of absorbents [8], captured by nanoparticles [9] in micromixers [10,11], and removed by more natural solutions like wetlands [12]. However, implementing any remedy measure needs sufficient understanding of the situation and reliable inclusive assessment of the potential risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various methods for dealing with heavy metal pollution in groundwater resources. These could be pumped and treated [6], be absorbed [7] by various kinds of absorbents [8], captured by nanoparticles [9] in micromixers [10,11], and removed by more natural solutions like wetlands [12]. However, implementing any remedy measure needs sufficient understanding of the situation and reliable inclusive assessment of the potential risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that compared to agricultural-based biosorbents, these adsorbents are often expensive. Biosorption of heavy metals is an alternative economical method [22,23]. The criteria for selection of the ideal biosorbent should include its availability, non-toxicity, cost, metal-binding capacity, and regeneration [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adsorption can be an economically sustainable and viable solution for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Adsorption has many advantages, such as simple operation, low cost, good Ph tolerance, and large industrial processing capacity [2,9,11,12]. However, there is still a need to develop and study new adsorbents, as many of the commonly applied adsorbent materials (activated carbons, zeolites, clay minerals, solid by-products of industrial processes and biosorbents) do not show satisfactory performance for the removal of heavy metals present in low concentrations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a need to develop and study new adsorbents, as many of the commonly applied adsorbent materials (activated carbons, zeolites, clay minerals, solid by-products of industrial processes and biosorbents) do not show satisfactory performance for the removal of heavy metals present in low concentrations [10]. Nanomaterials and especially carbon nanotubes (CNT) stand out as particularly promising materials to meet the requirements outlined above [4,10,11,13,14]. In order to achieve the desired level of efficiency for heavy metal removal, CNT functionalization has been widely investigated in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%