Relocalisation for degrowth and disaster risk reduction

Abstract

PurposeVulnerability is understood as susceptibility to hazards born out of the complex interaction within the system scales. The current global economic system focuses on persistent growth and a top-down approach to wealth distribution, which not only puts a strain on the Earth's resources but also on communities by increasing vulnerability. Localised economy, on the other hand, uses a bottom-up approach to wealth distribution, whereby local resources are harnessed for sustainability of the local economy. Localising economies facilitate degrowth by shifting our focus to the quality of economies and the redefinition of growth and prosperity. The purpose of this study is to highlight the potentials of localisation and degrowth for vulnerability reduction.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the authors conducted a case study of the Lyttelton community in New Zealand, their local initiatives and how these efforts have been used to build capacities and reduce vulnerabilities in the community. Data were sourced from both primary and secondary sources. Primary data were sourced through observation of the day-to-day running of the community and interviews with community members, while secondary data were sourced from existing literature on the community and related concepts.FindingsLyttelton community provides a good example of a community where bottom-up initiatives are particularly felt, and there is very limited dependence on the conventional economic system to solve their problems. The study shows that degrowth initiatives within the community have gained momentum because initiators see the value in their coming together as a community and doing what is right for themselves and the environment. Furthermore, localisation fosters innovation, personal growth and development and care for the environment.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the existing knowledge by discussing some local initiatives that serve an underlying purpose for degrowth based on a study carried out in Lyttelton, New Zealand. The study findings established that there is need for more focus on sensitisation about the risks of growth mania and the potential for degrowth in bringing about actual prosperity, for saving the environment and disaster risk reduction. Also, the encouragement of local production and existing institutions like the timebank, which give members access to the needed resources and skills contribute to vulnerability reduction.

The vision of sustainable sport in a backcasting research

“…On the other hand, this social distrustcoupled with the desire to have stronger communitieshas given rise to a strong decentralised and relocalised narrative. Relocalisation (Ajulo et al 2020), i.e. the robust network of local communities has appeared often in the dialogues giving rise to optimism that if companies have stronger local ties and municipalities have stronger authorities, a sustainability transition in sports can take place.…”

“Respect existence or expect … resilience?” epistemic reflexivity towards liberated disaster studies

“…Examining his sociological thought, I focus on his concept of reflexivity, which Wacquant (1992, p. 36) defines as "the inclusion of a theory of intellectual DPM 33,3 practice as an integral component and necessary condition of a critical theory of society". Epistemic reflexivity is about considering the social and intellectual biases that exist in a particular field [7], many of which go unnoticed by researchers but nevertheless influence their work. This way of considering reflexively has different levels: it is about the individual analyst and their origins as a researcher (class, gender, ethnicity, etc.…”

Tracing sustainable production from a degrowth and localisation perspective: A case of 3D printers

“…Especially considering the global spatialities of incumbent technologically mediated systems (Mocca, 2020). Localisation is the move away from globalised markets and supply chains, with the two not being mutually exclusive (Ajulo et al, 2020). Localisation of production is seen by many degrowth scholars as a key element that can foster the social and ecologically sustainable transition that degrowth proposes (Kallis, 2011;Gibson-Graham, 1996).…”

“…Localisation of production is seen by many degrowth scholars as a key element that can foster the social and ecologically sustainable transition that degrowth proposes (Kallis, 2011;Gibson-Graham, 1996). Through localising production, communities could become more self-sufficient, autonomous and develop local economies (Ajulo et al, 2020).…”