Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2015.2418226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability of InAs/GaAs Quantum Dot Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Silicon

Abstract: At low temperatures, indirect excitons formed at the in-plane electron-hole interface in a coupled-quantum-well structure undergo a spontaneous transition into a spatially modulated state. We report on the control of the instability wavelength, measurement of the dynamics of the exciton emission pattern, and observation of the fluctuation and commensurability effect of the exciton density wave. We found that fluctuations are suppressed when the instability wavelength is commensurate with defect separation alon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that these data represent worst case results since (i) the laser was operated epitaxial side up, (ii) the laser was not hard soldered to a high thermal conductivity heat-sink, and (iii) no facet coatings were used. Nevertheless, the estimated lifetime is much longer than the best reported extrapolated MTTF of 4,627 hours for a p-doped InAs/GaAs QD laser grown on Ge-on-Si ÔvirtualÕ substrate 23 . If the standard industrial techniques described above were used, even better lifetime performance is expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that these data represent worst case results since (i) the laser was operated epitaxial side up, (ii) the laser was not hard soldered to a high thermal conductivity heat-sink, and (iii) no facet coatings were used. Nevertheless, the estimated lifetime is much longer than the best reported extrapolated MTTF of 4,627 hours for a p-doped InAs/GaAs QD laser grown on Ge-on-Si ÔvirtualÕ substrate 23 . If the standard industrial techniques described above were used, even better lifetime performance is expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As shown in Figure 1b and c, a Figure 1b and c also reveal that the threading dislocation can be either pinned or propelled away from QDs. Therefore, the strong strain field of a QD array also prevents the in-plane motion of dislocations, and therefore superior reliability is expected from QD lasers compared with QW or bulk devices, even in the presence of high-density dislocations 22,23 .These unique properties of QDs provide a promising route towards monolithic III-V on silicon (III-V/Si) integration. As shown in Figure 1a, III-V QD lasers grown on silicon are rapidly approaching the performance of those grown on native GaAs substrates 24,25 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of these III/V nano ridges for laser integration on Si substrates is emphasized by the achieved ridge volume which could enable wave guidance and by the high crystal quality in line with the distinct PL. Quantum dot laser is a promising approach, as it seems to degrade less rapidly under the presence of non-radiative defects [18] [19]. Hetero-epitaxial growth of GaNAsP/GaBP based laser diode lattice matched on Si circumvents the formation of misfit dislocation (MD) but bears new challenges due to the complexity of the involved new material systems such as dilute nitrides…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Further testing of the same devices showed extrapolated lifetimes of 4600 h at aging conditions of 30 • C and more than twice the threshold. 39 These performance results and later results by Chen et al in 2016 showing 62.5 A/cm 2 current densities and extrapolated lifetimes >100 000 h at relaxed conditions 40 began to make the case that QD lasers grown on Si can be a commercial technology. The only problem is that none of these results made use of CMOS compatible on-axis (001) silicon substrates.…”
Section: Apl Photonics 3 030901 (2018)mentioning
confidence: 87%